[Talk-in] Administrative Boundary

[I Chengappa]

In response to why the boundary line is not visible, I'm not sure but the
lines I have seen are just marked as 'boundary=adminstrative', nothing
else. e.g. for way 433778075.

Also most boundaries are marked as a relation, not as a way. And then the
relation should be named. You can look at the Thrissur district boundary as
an example. Make sure that the boundary is closed. I noted also that some
of the nodes of the panchayat boundary are shared with other features, this
is generally a bad idea since if someone decides the other feature needs
adjusting, they can inadvertently alter the boundary as well.

Can I ask why all the building numbers are preceded with an 'X'? Will this
be removed at some stage?



On 24 August 2016 at 11:11, manoj k <manojkmohanme03107 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Forget to give the link https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/10.
> 6537/76.1548
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-in mailing list
> Talk-in at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/attachments/20160825/cb63d1ad/attachment.html>