[Talk-in] Administrative Boundary

Yogesh K S yogesh at itforchange.net
Tue Aug 30 16:31:35 UTC 2016


> In response to why the boundary line is not visible, I'm not sure but
> the lines I have seen are just marked as 'boundary=adminstrative',
> nothing else. e.g. for way 433778075.
>
> Also most boundaries are marked as a relation, not as a way. And then
> the relation should be named. 

I guess boundary mapping is still a work in progress by local mappers, I
see that WARD XI on way 433781627[1] will become a boundary relation
like Velur Ward VI[2].

@manoj: btw, great project with NSS volunteers. Hope they will continue
to map. :)



[1]https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433781627
[2]https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6526524

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 884 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/attachments/20160830/fd491024/attachment.sig>


More information about the Talk-in mailing list