[Talk-lt] secondary/tertiary in proposed definitions at WikiProject Lithuania

[Albertas Agejevas]

On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 3:20 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-lt <
talk-lt at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> It is also, obviously, causing cartographic issues only when secondary and
> tertiary roads are shown differently.
>

One man's cartographic issues is another man's useful information. As a
rule, renderers don't regard the surface when rendering roads, but for me
as a road user, for example, planning bike journeys, the visual distinction
is very useful. However, in principle I could agree. Our practice is
probably an instance of tagging for a renderer, and the same road
alternating between secondary and tertiary is not ideal.

As for the official road category not matching the actual importance, do
you have any concrete examples in mind?

Albertas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lt/attachments/20220607/85ae380b/attachment-0001.htm>