[OSM-talk-nl] maping bus routes, was Re: junction= roundabaout

[Maarten Deen]

On 2012-11-23 14:29, Cartinus wrote:
> On 11/23/2012 12:44 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
>> On 2012-11-22 21:14, Wolfgang Wienke wrote:
>>> Do you accept OXOMOA scheme?
>> 
>> This is the first that I ever hear from that scheme.
> 
> Please ignore the original oxomoa scheme when tagging bus routes. 
> There
> is a reason the scheme sits in someones private wiki-space: It was the
> first step in a long process that ended here [1].
> 
> Significant parts of the oxomoa scheme ended up in the final proposal,
> but parts of it didn't (like the incredibly insane type=line in stead 
> of
> type=route).
> 
> 
> On 11/23/2012 12:44 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
>> I don't know how it is done outside Limburg, but in Limburg the
>> relations are IIRC not grouped. I'm also not entirely sure how we
>> should
>> group them. In Germany there is a strong grouping in the
>> Verkehrsverbünde. We don't have that. We do have concessionareas, but
>> these can be large (Limburg is one concession, run by Veolia) and can
>> overlap (in Amsterdam, you'll find busses from different 
>> concessions).
> 
> In the central part of The Netherlands the name of the concession used
> to be put in the network tag of the relation. I just noticed someone
> didn't understand "relations are not categories" and created a
> type=public_transport + public_transport=network relation to group the
> lines of the concession "BRU stad".

I read from Wolgang's comments that this is also done for the AVV 
buslines. And it is common practice for walking and cycling networks.
Or is this a different kind of grouping relation?

Maarten