[OSM-talk-nl] maping bus routes, was Re: junction= roundabaout

[Wolfgang Wienke]

Am 23.11.2012 14:29, schrieb Cartinus:
> On 11/23/2012 12:44 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
>> On 2012-11-22 21:14, Wolfgang Wienke wrote:
>>> Do you accept OXOMOA scheme?
>>
>> This is the first that I ever hear from that scheme.
>
> Please ignore the original oxomoa scheme when tagging bus routes. There
> is a reason the scheme sits in someones private wiki-space: It was the
> first step in a long process that ended here [1].
>
> Significant parts of the oxomoa scheme ended up in the final proposal,
> but parts of it didn't (like the incredibly insane type=line in stead of
> type=route).
>
>
> On 11/23/2012 12:44 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
>> I don't know how it is done outside Limburg, but in Limburg the
>> relations are IIRC not grouped. I'm also not entirely sure how we
>> should
>> group them. In Germany there is a strong grouping in the
>> Verkehrsverbünde. We don't have that. We do have concessionareas, but
>> these can be large (Limburg is one concession, run by Veolia) and can
>> overlap (in Amsterdam, you'll find busses from different concessions).
>
> In the central part of The Netherlands the name of the concession used
> to be put in the network tag of the relation. I just noticed someone
> didn't understand "relations are not categories" and created a
> type=public_transport + public_transport=network relation to group the
> lines of the concession "BRU stad".
>
> Overlapping concessions are not a problem for either the network tag or
> the network relation, as neither relies on a contiguous geographic area.
>
>
> [1]<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_Transport>
>
Ok, in future i will use this, mapping separate routes for both 
directions, usung the public_tranport tags.

-- 
                                Mit freundlichen Gruessen

                                      Wolfgang Wienke