[talk-ph] your osm workplan for 2009

maning sambale emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com
Mon Jan 5 05:13:06 GMT 2009


On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Maning Sambale
<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 11:24 +0800, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 1. Declare Metro Manila "complete" (well, there are far too many
>> ongoing real estate developments to completely map but the general
>> areas should be done).
>
>
> When we "stamped" an area "complete" we need to define what we mean by
> complete.  We need to define a rough metric for "levels of
> completeness".
>
> If roughly we say:
> "All major roads (motorways, trunks and primarys) are mapped and labeled
> and the data is usable for basic road navigation"
>
> Then I can say Metro Manila is complete.
>
> I think there are some proposed evaluation/measurements for completeness
> in the OSM wiki we can use a framework for the Philippines.
>
> I propose we set "levels of completeness" like:
> level 1 - all roads are mapped and labeled
> level 2 - major POIs (fuel, schools, etc.) are mapped
> level 3 - footways and paths
> level 4 - landuse and buildings
> etc.
>
> This kind of levels maybe too car-centric but it could be a start.

This seems to be a good example for "completeness" or mapping status.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CALABARZON#Mapping_Status
-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------




More information about the talk-ph mailing list