[talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national parksboundaries

maning sambale emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com
Thu Jul 2 02:39:07 BST 2009


Documentation is here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Philippines/Data_import#National_parks_and_protected_Areas

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:21 AM, maning
sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
> It's done!
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1705598
>
> @ noel, Mount Kanlaon is included
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121643
> @ edwaypointsdotph, Lake Balinsasayao is also included
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121637
> @ murlwe, Moutn Apo is included
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121639 as well as a
> multiploygon relation to exclude PNOC
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/165773
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM, maning
> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected area
>> boundaries.  Anyone?
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning
>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Fineprint:
>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
>>> Restriction: No restriction of use
>>> Date: 12/08/00
>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity Conservation
>>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000
>>> Scale: 1:7,500,000
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue Pidor<murlwe at mail2engineer.com> wrote:
>>>> Maning,
>>>>
>>>> Where did you get this data I just want to know the sections of the Mt. Apo
>>>> National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3 section that
>>>> includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based on the shape
>>>> file, it is already merged.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> murlwe
>>>> <-----Original Message----->
>>>>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>>>>>Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM
>>>>>To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national
>>>>> parksboundaries
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload in OSM. I
>>>>>removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon boundaries.
>>>>>
>>>>>Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import.
>>>>>Download link:
>>>>> http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning
>>>>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we include those
>>>>>national park it would be much interesting for those who who use OSM for
>>>>>biodiversity conservation.
>>>>>> Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas there are no road
>>>>>> data simply because the are not much road in the first place. It
>>>>>> would be good for other data users (like conservationist) to be able
>>>>>> to use the data for their purpose. Some important features I dream of
>>>>>> adding:
>>>>>> 1. rivers
>>>>>> 2. landcover (different from landuse)
>>>>>> 3. coral reefs
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This can be mapped using landsat by the way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>> > noel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning
>>>>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Not good enough:
>>>>>>> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems small protected areas were marked as large squares just to
>>>>>>> appear on the 1:7M scale map.
>>>>>>> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit first, before import.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale
>>>>>>> <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar
>>>>><seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Should we add them? Why not?
>>>>>>>> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone to look at before adding
>>>>>them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm thinking of including additional tag, for example:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park
>>>>>>>> boundary=national_park
>>>>>>>> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for ref:
>>>>>>>> http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html
>>>>>>>> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual source of publication
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is this OK, or any better tag for this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think these are the same shapefiles that Microsoft Encarta
>>>>>used in its
>>>>>>>>> Atlas component and the same ones imported into Google Maps/Map
>>>>>Maker. For
>>>>>>>>> instance look at the following Google Maps links:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Biak-na-Bato National Park:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363,0.175781&z=13
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF
>>>>>>>> (I know because I stayed there for a few years)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning sambale
>>>>><emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I found this in my gis database:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 123pas_ini_unproc.shp Unproclaimed protected areas as initial
>>>>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland
>>>>>water priority
>>>>>>>>>> areas.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2pas_unproc_addl.shp Unproclaimed Protected areas as additional
>>>>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland
>>>>>water priority
>>>>>>>>>> areas.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 36pa_iniunproc_ver.shp Unproclaimed protected areas
>>>>>>>>>> with boundaries for verification as initial components
>>>>>vis-a-vis
>>>>>>>>>> integrated terrestrial and inland water priority areas.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 83pas_proc.shp Proclaimed protected areas vis-a-vis integrated
>>>>>>>>>> terrestrial and inland water priority areas.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fineprint:
>>>>>>>>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
>>>>>>>>>> Restriction: No restriction of use
>>>>>>>>>> Date: 12/08/00
>>>>>>>>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine
>>>>>Biodiversity
>>>>>>>>>> Conservation
>>>>>>>>>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000
>>>>>>>>>> Scale: 1:7,500,000
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Should we add them? FYI, we have 1 national park boundary
>>>>>added already:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.126&lon=121.124&zoom=11&layers=B000FTF
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> maning
>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>>>>>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>>>>>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> talk-ph mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>>> maning
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>>>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>>>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>> maning
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>> maning
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>cheers,
>>>>>maning
>>>>>------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>>>>wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>>>>blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>>>>------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>talk-ph mailing list
>>>>>talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>>>>t
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________
>>>> Get the Free email that has everyone talking at http://www.mail2world.com
>>>> Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> cheers,
>>> maning
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> cheers,
>> maning
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------




More information about the talk-ph mailing list