[talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ nationalparksboundaries

Thu Jul 2 06:29:26 BST 2009

Thanks, I have to remove my old Mt. Apo National Park data.

murlwe
<-----Original Message-----> 
>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>Sent: 7/2/2009 9:23:29 AM
>To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/
nationalparksboundaries
>
>It's done!
>
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1705598
>
>@ noel, Mount Kanlaon is included
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121643
>@ edwaypointsdotph, Lake Balinsasayao is also included
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121637
>@ murlwe, Moutn Apo is included
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121639 as well as a
>multiploygon relation to exclude PNOC
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/165773
>
>On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM, maning
>sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected
area
>> boundaries.  Anyone?
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning
>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Fineprint:
>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
>>> Restriction: No restriction of use
>>> Date: 12/08/00
>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity
>Conservation
>>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000
>>> Scale: 1:7,500,000
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue
>Pidor<murlwe at mail2engineer.com> wrote:
>>>> Maning,
>>>>
>>>> Where did you get this data I just want to know the sections of the
>Mt. Apo
>>>> National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3
>section that
>>>> includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based on the
shape
>>>> file, it is already merged.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> murlwe
>>>> <-----Original Message----->
>>>>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>>>>>Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM
>>>>>To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national
>>>>> parksboundaries
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload in OSM. I
>>>>>removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon boundaries.
>>>>>
>>>>>Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import.
>>>>>Download link:
>>>>>
http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning
>>>>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we
>include those
>>>>>national park it would be much interesting for those who who use
>OSM for
>>>>>biodiversity conservation.
>>>>>> Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas there are
>no road
>>>>>> data simply because the are not much road in the first
>place. It
>>>>>> would be good for other data users (like conservationist)
>to be able
>>>>>> to use the data for their purpose. Some important features
>I dream of
>>>>>> adding:
>>>>>> 1. rivers
>>>>>> 2. landcover (different from landuse)
>>>>>> 3. coral reefs
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This can be mapped using landsat by the way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>> > noel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning
>>>>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Not good enough:
>>>>>>>
>http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems small protected areas were marked as large
>squares just to
>>>>>>> appear on the 1:7M scale map.
>>>>>>> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit first,
>before import.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale
>>>>>>> <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar
>>>>><seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Should we add them? Why not?
>>>>>>>> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone to look
>at before adding
>>>>>them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm thinking of including additional tag, for example:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park
>>>>>>>> boundary=national_park
>>>>>>>> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for ref:
>>>>>>>>
>http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html
>>>>>>>> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual source of
>publication
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is this OK, or any better tag for this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think these are the same shapefiles that
>Microsoft Encarta
>>>>>used in its
>>>>>>>>> Atlas component and the same ones imported into
>Google Maps/Map
>>>>>Maker. For
>>>>>>>>> instance look at the following Google Maps links:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Biak-na-Bato National Park:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363
,0.175781&z=13
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layer
s=B000FTF
>>>>>>>> (I know because I stayed there for a few years)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning sambale
>>>>><emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I found this in my gis database:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 123pas_ini_unproc.shp Unproclaimed
>protected areas as initial
>>>>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial
>and inland
>>>>>water priority
>>>>>>>>>> areas.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2pas_unproc_addl.shp Unproclaimed Protected
>areas as additional
>>>>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial
>and inland
>>>>>water priority
>>>>>>>>>> areas.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 36pa_iniunproc_ver.shp Unproclaimed
>protected areas
>>>>>>>>>> with boundaries for verification as initial
>components
>>>>>vis-a-vis
>>>>>>>>>> integrated terrestrial and inland water
>priority areas.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 83pas_proc.shp Proclaimed protected areas
>vis-a-vis integrated
>>>>>>>>>> terrestrial and inland water priority areas.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fineprint:
>>>>>>>>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
>>>>>>>>>> Restriction: No restriction of use
>>>>>>>>>> Date: 12/08/00
>>>>>>>>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the
>Philippine
>>>>>Biodiversity
>>>>>>>>>> Conservation
>>>>>>>>>> Prior
>
>=== message truncated === 

<span id=m2wTl><p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" style="font-size:13.5px">_______________________________________________________________<BR>Get the Free email that has everyone talking at <a href=http://www.mail2world.com target=new>http://www.mail2world.com</a><br>  <font color=#999999>Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More!</font></font></span>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20090701/a4633cac/attachment.html>