[talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ nationalparksboundaries

[maning sambale]

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Marloue Pidor<murlwe at mail2engineer.com> wrote:
> Don't be sorry your import is better. Do not remove your import I based it
> on a paper map I guess its not really accurate.
OK

>Maning, I will be going to
> Manila this July 9-16 can we meet (when & where) I will return your GPStogo.
I prefer after office hours (7sh PM) within the vicinity of Marikina QC area

> Bdw, we will be having our micro mapping party tomorrow.
Oo nga!  May sponsor pa kayo for fuel!  Ingat sa driving while mapping!

Metro Manila mappers, where do we go next?

> murlwe
> <-----Original Message----->
>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>>Sent: 7/2/2009 5:26:38 PM
>>To: murlwe at mail2engineer.com
>>Cc: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/
>> nationalparksboundaries
>>
>>murlwe,
>>
>>I just saw the render of boundary=national_park.
>>There seems to be a previous boundary of Mt. Apo. I'm sorry for the
>>duplicate, should I remove my import?
>>
>>I'm not sure which data is a better.
>>
>>On 7/2/09, Marloue Pidor <murlwe at mail2engineer.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks, I have to remove my old Mt. Apo National Park data.
>>>
>>> murlwe
>>> <-----Original Message----->
>>>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>>>>Sent: 7/2/2009 9:23:29 AM
>>>>To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/
>>> nationalparksboundaries
>>>>
>>>>It's done!
>>>>
>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1705598
>>>>
>>>>@ noel, Mount Kanlaon is included
>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121643
>>>>@ edwaypointsdotph, Lake Balinsasayao is also included
>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121637
>>>>@ murlwe, Moutn Apo is included
>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121639 as well as a
>>>>multiploygon relation to exclude PNOC
>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/165773
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM, maning
>>>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected
>>> area
>>>>> boundaries. Anyone?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning
>>>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Fineprint:
>>>>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
>>>>>> Restriction: No restriction of use
>>>>>> Date: 12/08/00
>>>>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity
>>>>Conservation
>>>>>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000
>>>>>> Scale: 1:7,500,000
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue
>>>>Pidor<murlwe at mail2engineer.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Maning,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where did you get this data I just want to know the
>>sections of the
>>>>Mt. Apo
>>>>>>> National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3
>>>>section that
>>>>>>> includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based
>>on the
>>> shape
>>>>>>> file, it is already merged.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> murlwe
>>>>>>> <-----Original Message----->
>>>>>>>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>>>>>>>>Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM
>>>>>>>>To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/
>>national
>>>>>>>> parksboundaries
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload
>>in OSM. I
>>>>>>>>removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon
>>boundaries.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import.
>>>>>>>>Download link:
>>>>>>>>
>>> http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning
>>>>>>>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we
>>>>include those
>>>>>>>>national park it would be much interesting for those who
>>who use
>>>>OSM for
>>>>>>>>biodiversity conservation.
>>>>>>>>> Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas
>>there are
>>>>no road
>>>>>>>>> data simply because the are not much road in the first
>>>>place. It
>>>>>>>>> would be good for other data users (like
>>conservationist)
>>>>to be able
>>>>>>>>> to use the data for their purpose. Some important
>>features
>>>>I dream of
>>>>>>>>> adding:
>>>>>>>>> 1. rivers
>>>>>>>>> 2. landcover (different from landuse)
>>>>>>>>> 3. coral reefs
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This can be mapped using landsat by the way.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>>>> > noel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning
>>>>>>>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Not good enough:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It seems small protected areas were marked as large
>>>>squares just to
>>>>>>>>>> appear on the 1:7M scale map.
>>>>>>>>>> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit
>>first,
>>>>before import.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale
>>>>>>>>>> <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene
>>Alvin Villar
>>>>>>>><seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Should we add them? Why not?
>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone
>>to look
>>>>at before adding
>>>>>>>>them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking of including additional tag,
>>for example:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park
>>>>>>>>>>> boundary=national_park
>>>>>>>>>>> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for
>>ref:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html
>>>>>>>>>>> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual
>>source of
>>>>publication
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is this OK, or any better tag for this?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think these are the same shapefiles that
>>>>Microsoft Encarta
>>>>>>>>used in its
>>>>>>>>>>>> Atlas component and the same ones
>>imported into
>>>>Google Maps/Map
>>>>>>>>Maker. For
>>>>>>>>>>>> instance look at the following Google
>>Maps links:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Biak-na-Bato National Park:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363
>>> ,0.175781&z=13
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layer
>>> s=B000FTF
>>>>>>>>>>> (I know because I stayed there for a few years)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning
>>sambale
>>>>
>>
>>=== message truncated ===
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get the Free email that has everyone talking at http://www.mail2world.com
> Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More!



-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------