[talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ nationalparksboundaries

Thu Jul 2 18:07:28 BST 2009

Don't be sorry your import is better. Do not remove your import I based
it on a paper map I guess its not really accurate. Maning, I will be
going to Manila this July 9-16 can we meet (when & where) I will return
your GPStogo. 

Bdw, we will be having our micro mapping party tomorrow.

murlwe
<-----Original Message-----> 
>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>Sent: 7/2/2009 5:26:38 PM
>To: murlwe at mail2engineer.com
>Cc: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/
nationalparksboundaries
>
>murlwe,
>
>I just saw the render of boundary=national_park.
>There seems to be a previous boundary of Mt. Apo. I'm sorry for the
>duplicate, should I remove my import?
>
>I'm not sure which data is a better.
>
>On 7/2/09, Marloue Pidor <murlwe at mail2engineer.com> wrote:
>> Thanks, I have to remove my old Mt. Apo National Park data.
>>
>> murlwe
>> <-----Original Message----->
>>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>>>Sent: 7/2/2009 9:23:29 AM
>>>To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/
>> nationalparksboundaries
>>>
>>>It's done!
>>>
>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1705598
>>>
>>>@ noel, Mount Kanlaon is included
>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121643
>>>@ edwaypointsdotph, Lake Balinsasayao is also included
>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121637
>>>@ murlwe, Moutn Apo is included
>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121639 as well as a
>>>multiploygon relation to exclude PNOC
>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/165773
>>>
>>>On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM, maning
>>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected
>> area
>>>> boundaries. Anyone?
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning
>>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Fineprint:
>>>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
>>>>> Restriction: No restriction of use
>>>>> Date: 12/08/00
>>>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity
>>>Conservation
>>>>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000
>>>>> Scale: 1:7,500,000
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue
>>>Pidor<murlwe at mail2engineer.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Maning,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where did you get this data I just want to know the
>sections of the
>>>Mt. Apo
>>>>>> National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3
>>>section that
>>>>>> includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based
>on the
>> shape
>>>>>> file, it is already merged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> murlwe
>>>>>> <-----Original Message----->
>>>>>>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com]
>>>>>>>Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM
>>>>>>>To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/
>national
>>>>>>> parksboundaries
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload
>in OSM. I
>>>>>>>removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon
>boundaries.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import.
>>>>>>>Download link:
>>>>>>>
>> http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning
>>>>>>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we
>>>include those
>>>>>>>national park it would be much interesting for those who
>who use
>>>OSM for
>>>>>>>biodiversity conservation.
>>>>>>>> Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas
>there are
>>>no road
>>>>>>>> data simply because the are not much road in the first
>>>place. It
>>>>>>>> would be good for other data users (like
>conservationist)
>>>to be able
>>>>>>>> to use the data for their purpose. Some important
>features
>>>I dream of
>>>>>>>> adding:
>>>>>>>> 1. rivers
>>>>>>>> 2. landcover (different from landuse)
>>>>>>>> 3. coral reefs
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This can be mapped using landsat by the way.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>>> > noel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning
>>>>>>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Not good enough:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It seems small protected areas were marked as large
>>>squares just to
>>>>>>>>> appear on the 1:7M scale map.
>>>>>>>>> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit
>first,
>>>before import.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale
>>>>>>>>> <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene
>Alvin Villar
>>>>>>><seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Should we add them? Why not?
>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone
>to look
>>>at before adding
>>>>>>>them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking of including additional tag,
>for example:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park
>>>>>>>>>> boundary=national_park
>>>>>>>>>> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for
>ref:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html
>>>>>>>>>> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual
>source of
>>>publication
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is this OK, or any better tag for this?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think these are the same shapefiles that
>>>Microsoft Encarta
>>>>>>>used in its
>>>>>>>>>>> Atlas component and the same ones
>imported into
>>>Google Maps/Map
>>>>>>>Maker. For
>>>>>>>>>>> instance look at the following Google
>Maps links:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Biak-na-Bato National Park:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.0823
63
>> ,0.175781&z=13
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&lay
er
>> s=B000FTF
>>>>>>>>>> (I know because I stayed there for a few years)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning
>sambale
>>>
>
>=== message truncated === 

<span id=m2wTl><p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" style="font-size:13.5px">_______________________________________________________________<BR>Get the Free email that has everyone talking at <a href=http://www.mail2world.com target=new>http://www.mail2world.com</a><br>  <font color=#999999>Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More!</font></font></span>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20090702/31a141c0/attachment.html>