[talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national parks boundaries

[maning sambale]

Not good enough:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png

It seems small protected areas were marked as large squares just to
appear on the 1:7M scale map.
Still other boundaries are good.  Need to edit first, before import.

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Should we add them? Why not?
> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone to look at before adding them.
>
> I'm thinking of including additional tag, for example:
>
> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park
> boundary=national_park
> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for ref:
> http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html
> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual source of publication
>
> Is this OK, or any better tag for this?
>
>
>> I think these are the same shapefiles that Microsoft Encarta used in its
>> Atlas component and the same ones imported into Google Maps/Map Maker. For
>> instance look at the following Google Maps links:
>>
>> Biak-na-Bato National Park:
>> http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363,0.175781&z=13
>
> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF
> (I know because I stayed there for a few years)
>
>
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I found this in my gis database:
>>>
>>> 123pas_ini_unproc.shp Unproclaimed protected areas as initial
>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland water priority
>>> areas.
>>>
>>> 2pas_unproc_addl.shp Unproclaimed Protected areas as additional
>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland water priority
>>> areas.
>>>
>>> 36pa_iniunproc_ver.shp  Unproclaimed protected areas
>>> with boundaries for verification as initial components vis-a-vis
>>> integrated terrestrial and inland water priority areas.
>>>
>>> 83pas_proc.shp Proclaimed protected areas vis-a-vis integrated
>>> terrestrial and inland water priority areas.
>>>
>>> Fineprint:
>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines
>>> Restriction: No restriction of use
>>> Date: 12/08/00
>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity
>>> Conservation
>>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000
>>> Scale: 1:7,500,000
>>>
>>> Should we add them?   FYI, we have 1 national park boundary added already:
>>>
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.126&lon=121.124&zoom=11&layers=B000FTF
>>>
>>> --
>>> cheers,
>>> maning
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> talk-ph mailing list
>>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------