[talk-ph] best practice for mapping landuse=farm

[Eugene Alvin Villar]

I guess this is OK. :-)

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:34 AM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I think we should mark entire farms as one polygon as much as possible
> and
> > not separate individual "paddies" as their own polygons. The dirt paths
> and
> > irrigation canals are still part of the farm, right?
> No I'm not marking individual paddies.  Maybe my message was a bit
> confusing.
> The SPOT5 has a pix res of 10 meters.  I usually map a farm polygon
> when there is obvious subdivision between adjacent farms like large
> irrigation canals.  This is usually visible in the image at around 4-5
> pixels (roughly 40-50 meters).  The gap size seems sensible enough.
>
> Whenever possible, I am also excluding residential areas around the farms.
>
> Is this OK?
>
> Sorry I can't provide a visual example (the data is on another
> machine) and I haven't added anything in the OSM database just yet.
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>



-- 
http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20091120/11306dc7/attachment.html>