[talk-ph] no uturn on a dual-carriageway, how?

[Eugene Alvin Villar]

Maning, BTW, only_left_turn means just that: you can only turn left from the
"from" road. Which means that you can't even go straight! So the two
only_left_turn relations at the Lanuza-Ortigas intersection is wrong.


On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com>wrote:

> There should be one via: the bit of road connecting the to and from. So
> Lanuza should be split here. No need to add nodes as via.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:07 PM, maning sambale <
> emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This spot:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=14.589184&mlon=121.071306&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF
>>
>> allows you to take left and right turns but not u-turns
>>
>> According to this document,
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Turn_restrictions
>>
>> relation turn restrictions should have 3 members (from, to, via)  But
>> this spot should have 5 members (3 ways and 2 via nodes).
>>
>> What is the correct relation "membership" for this case?
>> --
>> cheers,
>> maning
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
>> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
>



-- 
http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20100617/7699c83f/attachment.html>