[talk-ph] no uturn on a dual-carriageway, how?

Eugene Alvin Villar seav80 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 17 14:57:32 BST 2010


There should be one via: the bit of road connecting the to and from. So
Lanuza should be split here. No need to add nodes as via.


On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:07 PM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>wrote:

> This spot:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=14.589184&mlon=121.071306&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF
>
> allows you to take left and right turns but not u-turns
>
> According to this document,
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Turn_restrictions
>
> relation turn restrictions should have 3 members (from, to, via)  But
> this spot should have 5 members (3 ways and 2 via nodes).
>
> What is the correct relation "membership" for this case?
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>



-- 
http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20100617/f17c27bb/attachment.html>


More information about the talk-ph mailing list