[talk-ph] RFC: Planned Arivac Bohol Data Import
emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com
Tue Mar 30 06:56:55 BST 2010
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Totor <totor_osm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I think option 3 is the best indeed, so that we will not lose the existing road classification.
Done! I'm finished with conflating OSM and Arivac data. There are
some ways that I did not removed because I'm not sure which has better
Eugene has some reservations with using:
Should I revert back to source_url:http://hisdu2.sph.uq.edu.au/arivac/ ?
> Would it be a big job to also create an osm file with the ways that are not imported ?
I can provide the original OSM file for others to use with offline editing.
> This would allow in a second time to manually check the position of the already existing roads. (since some seem based on gps traces jumping all over the place.)
> We could also wait for GPS traces...
I hope they provide them as well.
I will wait for more replies today before uploading the initial
import. I hope to finish this today so that others can start editing
this holy week. Think of it as your penance. :)
> --- On Tue, 3/30/10, maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: Planned Arivac Bohol Data Import
>> To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>> Date: Tuesday, March 30, 2010, 2:19 AM
>> Alright, I didn't "hear" any
>> objections, so I assume the community is
>> OK with the road import. We will be adopting Option 3
>> : Pre-process
>> data to remove any duplicates from existing OSM data before
>> I will start conflating both data offline (osm and
>> arivac). When
>> there is duplicate with arivac, OSM data will be
>> retained. The
>> generic tag for roads are as follows:
>> FIXME:verify road type
>> arivac_ID_ROA_BAS_: some number
>> The donor requested to retain the "arivac_ID_ROA_BAS_: some
>> number" so
>> that they can integrate our improvements into their own
>> database later
>> After the import, more work is needed particularly in add
>> the correct
>> highway category.
>> I will announce the import later and will proceed if there
>> no further
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Totor <totor_osm at yahoo.com>
>> > Hello all,
>> > Great data as far as it can be checked.
>> > (there are not that many gps traces in Tagbilaran with
>> a good dop)
>> > The maximum offset to my gps tracks is around 5m
>> > Some intersections look a bit weird (4 roads join 2 by
>> 2, then a link joins the 2 nodes instead of 1 common node
>> for the 4 segments) but that can be fixed easily later on.
>> > Regards,
>> > Totor
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
More information about the talk-ph