[talk-ph] Some towns of Laguna a bit far from reality? (was: can you help me with this one?)

Anthony G. Balico anthony.balico at gmail.com
Tue Sep 21 08:22:32 BST 2010


Apparently, there's no enough gps traces in Siniloan proper to confirm
proper locations of the roads, hence the mismatch from satellite
imagery.


-----Original Message-----
From: tutubi <tutubi at backpackingphilippines.com>
To: maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
Cc: osm-ph <talk-ph at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Some towns of Laguna a bit far from reality?
(was: can you help me with this one?)
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:06:04 +0800


Hi Maning,

i guess it's BSWM as it's also the roads I aligned in Pakil and Paete
as well as those I deleted/labeled as FIXMEs in Lumban town. The roads
I deleted in Pakil earlier were also labeled BSWM.

It appears the stray roads of Pangil are also duplicates for they
align with my trace, yet parallel with the main and only road in and
out of barangay Balian

Pagsanjan town only needed street names (added already) while Sta.
Cruz is pretty much covered and accurate so far

Siniloan is most problematic that's why I asked for help. you can see
I passed by the highway before going to Siniloan town proper to cvoer
more ground. Siniloan map need to me dragged southward and compressed.

btw, what's wrong with Magallanes?

thanks for the help


On 9/21/10, maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tutubi asked to look at his traces in Laguna.  Looking at his trace
> and the existing data.  I am perplexed at the significant mismatch:
> http://sautter.com/map/?zoom=17&lat=14.4219&lon=121.44588&layers=00B000TFFFFFFF
>
> Pakil has some issues as well.
> http://sautter.com/map/?zoom=17&lat=14.38564&lon=121.47735&layers=00B000TFFFFFFF
>
> I'm guessing this an artifact of the old BSWM data import.  Or
> probably similar to Magallanes situation?
>
> Forwarded conversation
> Subject: can you help me with this one?
> ------------------------
>
> From: tutubi <tutubi at backpackingphilippines.com>
> Date: Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:59 AM
> To: maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
>
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/backpacking%20philippines/traces/823535
>
> it's a trace i did in siniloan, laguna from sta cruz. note the
> mis-alligned roads, same ones i got from Pakil that i re-traced so
> it's ok now.
>
> there are some roads in my trace that i passed by twice...looked like
> the traces were just converted to ways thus the jagged roads
>
> thanks
>
> --
> ---
> I explore, therefore I blog.
>
> http://www.backpackingphilippines.com
>
> ----------
> From: maning sambale <emmanuel.sambale at gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:05 PM
> To: tutubi <tutubi at backpackingphilippines.com>
>
>
> OK. I'll look into it later.  Paki-alamanan ko na ha. :)
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> ------------------------------------------------------
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20100921/756b3eba/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the talk-ph mailing list