[talk-ph] place=neighbourhood not rendered

[maning sambale]

What about those tagged as landuse=residential?

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've looked at the two OSM Wiki pages about "neighbourhoods"
> (everyone, note the "u" since we're using British spelling mostly in
> OSM):
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Neighbourhood
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood
>
> I agree that we can use this to tag subdivisions, urban puroks, urban
> sitios, and the like.
>
> place=subdivision is non-standard and place=hamlet is not appropriate
> since these are used for small rural settlements (maybe we can use for
> rural puroks and sitios?). place=locality, which one local mapper has
> been using to tag subdivisions, seems inappropriate too since it's
> meant to be used for named but unpopulated places.
>
> Eugene
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Rally de Leon <ralleon at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Earlier schadow1 (Ervin) posted under subject_line: "[OSMPH GPS:14] place= ?"
>> on osmph-gps-dev at googlegroups.com regarding proper tag for "subdivision".
>>
>> I took the opportunity (on my usual lengthy reply ;-) cc:talk-ph) to
>> propose/push for a more appropriate substitute tag
>> "place=neighborhood" for many inconsistently tagged node-places such
>> as subdivision, locality and hamlet by lots of users (including me).
>>
>> This is just a follow-up. I already stated my case/proposal in my
>> reply, but I may also be wrong on this, (being lazy on extensive
>> research). I need to hear your reactions, votes and/or
>> counter-proposals, coz this is going to affect a lot of your edits,
>> including the potential none-rendering of many sub-village
>> named-places in PH on Mapnik.
>>
>> The issue at the moment with nodes (and polygons tagged
>> landuse=residential) tagged with place=neighbourhood is no rendering
>> on Mapnik. https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4191
>>
>> Other references:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Neighbourhood
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
>>
>> We have to admit that this seemingly simple place-classification is
>> still confusing for many, as evidenced on edits by old and new users
>> still using inconsistent tags. We must do something about it sooner or
>> later. So how do we proceed? Do we start promoting & educating on the
>> use of "neighbourhood" or status quo until rendering issue is
>> resolved?
>>
>> Rally :-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------------