[talk-ph] Block number addressing on Philippine?

Satoshi IIDA nyampire at gmail.com
Fri Apr 11 12:48:38 UTC 2014


Thank you very much!! > All

Maybe some of search function for block address system would not work well
now.
But I hope it could be possible if the structure is standardized. :)

> about "underscore _"
I see, I would make an announcement to JP mappers to change
"addr:block_number".
("addr:blocknumber"(JP) is fewer used.)

> Sample of Philippine
If someone could, please write a sample and description to OSM wikipage?
(At this time, Tag table on Philippine address page is better.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Addressing)

In case of...
Structure tree for this case is "Barangay" -> "neighbourhood/subdivision"
-> "lot" -> "block_number" -> "housenumber"?

Regards.




2014-04-11 18:33 GMT+09:00 Ervin Malicdem <schadow1 at gmail.com>:

> Hi Satoshi-san
>
> The block number system is also used in the Philippines mostly on new
> residential area development projects when street names do not exist yet. I
> was advised before to use the Karlsluhe standard to tag the block and lot
> number inside the addr:number tag however it does not work properly for the
> purpose of address search with generating maps for Garmin and is very
> tedious as plugins for shortcut addressing does not recognize alphanumeric
> information.
>
> I also strongly believe that with these drawbacks, block number system
> tagging must be insisted in the Philippines.
>
> The addr:block_number came from the proposal 2 years ago that can be seen
> from this wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/list
>
> Regards,
>
> Ervin M.
> *Schadow1 Expeditions* - A Filipino must not be a stranger to his own
> motherland.
> http://www.s1expeditions.com
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Satoshi IIDA <nyampire at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've discussed about address tagging scheme for "city block address
>> system" on dev & Tagging ML.
>>
>> Block address system is used (maybe only) in Japan.
>> (It is addressing scheme related to "Block", not to "Street")
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2014-April/027825.html
>>
>> And Japanese mappers made propose "addr:blocknumber".
>> But in 2 month ago, "addr:block_number"(with underscore _ ) is used on
>> Philippine.
>> Here.
>> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/32h
>>
>> I would like to confirm a few points.
>>
>> 1. Block number address system is used in Philippine?
>> According to OSM wiki page, there is no definition to block_number in
>> Philippine.
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Addressing
>>
>> 1-1.
>> If block_number system is used, I would like to confirm they are same or
>> not to Japanese ones.
>> Please tell me some (maybe out of OSM wiki) documentation.
>> If they are the same concept, "_" ambiguous should be integrated :)
>>
>> Japanese Documentation is here.
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:addr#.E6.97.A5.E6.9C.AC.E3.81.AE.E4.BD.8F.E6.89.80.E8.A1.A8.E8.A8.98.E3.81.AB.E3.81.A4.E3.81.84.E3.81.A6
>>
>> Block structure detail
>> (sorry, written in Japanese, & certainly need more easy description...)
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Addresses
>>
>> 1-2.
>> If not used, please tell me more appropriate "addr:*" tag for
>> "addr:block_number" nodes.
>> I think "addr:subdivision" or "addr:barangay" is suitable tagging than
>> "addr:block_number" to them...
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Satoshi IIDA
>> mail: nyampire at gmail.com
>> twitter: @nyampire
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>
>>
>


-- 
Satoshi IIDA
mail: nyampire at gmail.com
twitter: @nyampire
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20140411/6a4deba2/attachment.html>


More information about the talk-ph mailing list