[talk-ph] "OSM-PH" or "OSMPH" or "OSM PH"?
Erwin Olario
govvin at gmail.com
Mon Feb 10 01:44:37 UTC 2014
Ayon sa ISO 3166 standards, ang "PH" and "PHL" ay country code ng Pilipinas
(pero magka-ibang section ng koda)
*Erwin Olario*
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
» email: erwin@ <erwin at ngnuity.net>*n**GNU**it**y**.**net*<http://ngnuity.net/>
| govvin at gmail.com
» mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013 | (USA): +1 347 746 9461
» OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Carlo Antonio Romero <carlo.romero at gmail.com
> wrote:
> Id go for "OSM-PH" and "OSM PH" and "OpenStreetMap Philippines" depending
> on the usage
>
> "OSM-PH" is to be used for file names such as the garmin maps.
> "OpenStreetMap Philippines" for print, training (and or formal) materials
> and "OSM PH" as an accepted abbreviation of the formal name when it has to
> be used multiple times in the literature.
>
> Carlo.
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Noel S. Mondragon <noel_pylon03 at yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>> I think OSM-PHL will be much appropriate..dba ISO name of Philippines is
>> PHL ?/correct me if im wrong para naman masunod tayo sa standard ng
>> ISO,,thats my opinion.
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> Noel S. Mondragon
>> Staff
>> Information Office
>> (034) 312 52 05
>> San Carlos City Hall
>> FC Ledesma Avenue
>> San Carlos City 6127
>> Negros Occidental Province
>>
>> --------------------------------------------
>> On Sat, 2/8/14, talk-ph-request at openstreetmap.org <
>> talk-ph-request at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>
>> Subject: talk-ph Digest, Vol 67, Issue 6
>> To: talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>> Date: Saturday, February 8, 2014, 10:23 PM
>>
>> Send talk-ph mailing list submissions
>> to
>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
>> to
>> talk-ph-request at openstreetmap.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> talk-ph-owner at openstreetmap.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
>> specific
>> than "Re: Contents of talk-ph digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Fwd: "OSM-PH" or "OSMPH" or "OSM
>> PH"? (Erwin Olario)
>> 2. Fwd: Fwd: "OSM-PH" or "OSMPH" or
>> "OSM PH"? (Erwin Olario)
>> 3. Re: Fwd: "OSM-PH" or "OSMPH" or "OSM
>> PH"? (Eugene Alvin Villar)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 08:46:01 +0800
>> From: Erwin Olario <govvin at gmail.com>
>> To: osm-ph <talk-ph at openstreetmap.org>
>> Subject: [talk-ph] Fwd: "OSM-PH" or "OSMPH" or "OSM
>> PH"?
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> <CAPmGdL8tVZJ9j4FMoo6=X6tax32Bix73iyESyT-y+eAT_bwqRQ at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Mas pabor ako sa OSM-PH, at palaging ganito ang gamit ko
>> nito. Pero, kung
>> magkaroon man ng "opisyal" na pagpapaikli ng pangalan ng
>> grupo ay walang
>> problema at susundin ko.
>>
>> Sa ganang akin, ang hindi ko pag-gamit ng "OSMPH" ay dahil
>> para itong
>> maling pagbaybay ng isang salita. Samantalang ang salitan
>> "OSM" ay malawak
>> na ang pag-tanggap sa Internet at ang pag-dagdag naman ng
>> daglit at "PH" ay
>> nagpapahiwatig lang ng koneksyon nito sa Pilipinas.
>>
>> Kung tutuusin nga ay mas gusto ko pa nga ang "OSM-PHL" imbes
>> na OSM-PH.
>> Puede bang ipanukala din at isama ito sa botohan? (Teka,
>> botohan 'ba to?) :D
>>
>>
>> *Erwin Olario*
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> ? email: erwin@ <erwin at ngnuity.net>*n**GNU**it**y**.**net*<
>> http://ngnuity.net/>
>> | govvin at gmail.com
>> ? mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013 | (USA): +1 347 746 9461
>> ? OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4
>> 81CE 3A93 D56B
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello everyone,
>> >>
>> >> I want to try and have a consistent "brand" for
>> OpenStreetMap Philippines
>> >> now that we are getting quite a bit of attention.
>> >>
>> >> When abbreviating "OpenStreetMap Philippines",
>> which is better? "OSM-PH"
>> >> or "OSMPH" or "OSM PH"? I prefer "OSMPH" but maning
>> seems to prefer
>> >> "OSM-PH".
>> >>
>> >> I looked at how other countries do it but I don't
>> see any pattern (OSMUS?
>> >> OSM-US? OSM-FR? OSMDE? OSM UK?).
>> >>
>> >> Eugene
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> talk-ph mailing list
>> >> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>> >>
>> >>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20140209/8482c2e5/attachment-0001.html
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 13:10:14 +0800
>> From: Erwin Olario <govvin at gmail.com>
>> To: osm-ph <talk-ph at openstreetmap.org>
>> Subject: [talk-ph] Fwd: Fwd: "OSM-PH" or "OSMPH" or
>> "OSM PH"?
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAPmGdL_BCS4iB8SX6NxmKxu=v9KdwhuiH-aMXfkh0JmyDyPQeA at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> May nagkamaling magpa-dala ng kanila sagot sa akin, imbes na
>> sa grupo.
>>
>> Madalas ding mangyari sa'kin ito. Meron pong
>> "reply_goes_to_list" variable
>> sa Mailma. Pwede bang gawing default na sagot ay tutungo sa
>> mailing list at
>> hindi sa huling taong nagpadala? Hindi kasi nangyayari sa
>> akin ito sa ibang
>> mailing lists na sinapian ko eh.
>>
>> Erwin
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Gerardo Calimoso <gcalimoso at gmail.com>
>> Date: 2014-02-09 12:52 GMT+08:00
>> Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Fwd: "OSM-PH" or "OSMPH" or "OSM
>> PH"?
>> To: Erwin Olario <govvin at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> Mas mainam na may ph o phl para alam kung saan ang
>> pinagmulan ng grupo
>>
>> On Feb 9, 2014 8:47 AM, "Erwin Olario" <govvin at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Mas pabor ako sa OSM-PH, at palaging ganito ang gamit
>> ko nito. Pero, kung
>> magkaroon man ng "opisyal" na pagpapaikli ng pangalan ng
>> grupo ay walang
>> problema at susundin ko.
>> >
>> > Sa ganang akin, ang hindi ko pag-gamit ng "OSMPH" ay
>> dahil para itong
>> maling pagbaybay ng isang salita. Samantalang ang salitan
>> "OSM" ay malawak
>> na ang pag-tanggap sa Internet at ang pag-dagdag naman ng
>> daglit at "PH" ay
>> nagpapahiwatig lang ng koneksyon nito sa Pilipinas.
>> >
>> > Kung tutuusin nga ay mas gusto ko pa nga ang "OSM-PHL"
>> imbes na OSM-PH.
>> Puede bang ipanukala din at isama ito sa botohan? (Teka,
>> botohan 'ba to?) :D
>> >
>> >
>> > Erwin Olario
>> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> > ? email: erwin at nGNUity.net |
>> govvin at gmail.com
>> > ? mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013 | (USA): +1 347 746
>> 9461
>> > ? OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94
>> 63A4 81CE 3A93
>> D56B
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar
>> <seav80 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello everyone,
>> >>>
>> >>> I want to try and have a consistent "brand" for
>> OpenStreetMap
>> Philippines now that we are getting quite a bit of
>> attention.
>> >>>
>> >>> When abbreviating "OpenStreetMap Philippines",
>> which is better?
>> "OSM-PH" or "OSMPH" or "OSM PH"? I prefer "OSMPH" but maning
>> seems to
>> prefer "OSM-PH".
>> >>>
>> >>> I looked at how other countries do it but I
>> don't see any pattern
>> (OSMUS? OSM-US? OSM-FR? OSMDE? OSM UK?).
>> >>>
>> >>> Eugene
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> talk-ph mailing list
>> >>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>> >>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > talk-ph mailing list
>> > talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20140209/c277b463/attachment-0001.html
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:23:00 +0800
>> From: Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com>
>> To: Erwin Olario <govvin at gmail.com>
>> Cc: osm-ph <talk-ph at openstreetmap.org>
>> Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Fwd: "OSM-PH" or "OSMPH" or "OSM
>> PH"?
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> <CAPhqi6JoMWybwYGpw+kH23RWNbdd-97OT-hDvKuffr8Ko=Kj7g at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Translating for the benefit of the international audience of
>> this mailing
>> list :)
>>
>> I'm more in favor of OSM-PH, and this is what I always use.
>> But, if there
>> > will be an "official" abbreviation of the group, I will
>> have no problem
>> > following this.
>> >
>> > In my opinion, I do not use "OSMPH" because it seems
>> like a wrong spelling
>> > of a word. On the other hand, "OSM" is widely used on
>> the Internet and
>> > adding a hyphen and "PH" only indicates connection to
>> the Philippines.
>> >
>> > I actually prefer "OSM-PHL" instead of OSM-PH. Can we
>> include this in the
>> > voting? (Wait, is this a vote?) :D
>> >
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Erwin Olario <govvin at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Mas pabor ako sa OSM-PH, at palaging ganito ang gamit
>> ko nito. Pero, kung
>> > magkaroon man ng "opisyal" na pagpapaikli ng pangalan
>> ng grupo ay walang
>> > problema at susundin ko.
>> >
>> > Sa ganang akin, ang hindi ko pag-gamit ng "OSMPH" ay
>> dahil para itong
>> > maling pagbaybay ng isang salita. Samantalang ang
>> salitan "OSM" ay malawak
>> > na ang pag-tanggap sa Internet at ang pag-dagdag naman
>> ng daglit at "PH" ay
>> > nagpapahiwatig lang ng koneksyon nito sa Pilipinas.
>> >
>> > Kung tutuusin nga ay mas gusto ko pa nga ang "OSM-PHL"
>> imbes na OSM-PH.
>> > Puede bang ipanukala din at isama ito sa botohan?
>> (Teka, botohan 'ba to?) :D
>> >
>> >
>> > *Erwin Olario*
>> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>> > ? email: erwin@ <erwin at ngnuity.net>*n**GNU**it**y**.**net*<
>> http://ngnuity.net/>
>> > | govvin at gmail.com
>> > ? mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013 | (USA): +1 347 746
>> 9461
>> > ? OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94
>> 63A4 81CE 3A93
>> > D56B
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar
>> <seav80 at gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hello everyone,
>> >>>
>> >>> I want to try and have a consistent "brand" for
>> OpenStreetMap
>> >>> Philippines now that we are getting quite a bit
>> of attention.
>> >>>
>> >>> When abbreviating "OpenStreetMap Philippines",
>> which is better? "OSM-PH"
>> >>> or "OSMPH" or "OSM PH"? I prefer "OSMPH" but
>> maning seems to prefer
>> >>> "OSM-PH".
>> >>>
>> >>> I looked at how other countries do it but I
>> don't see any pattern
>> >>> (OSMUS? OSM-US? OSM-FR? OSMDE? OSM UK?).
>> >>>
>> >>> Eugene
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> talk-ph mailing list
>> >>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > talk-ph mailing list
>> > talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>> >
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20140209/f1a76ff1/attachment.html
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>
>>
>> End of talk-ph Digest, Vol 67, Issue 6
>> **************************************
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/attachments/20140210/01317e66/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the talk-ph
mailing list