[talk-ph] Mount Banahaw and San Cristobal Protected Landscape

[maning sambale]

Slightly similar case in Mt. Palay-palay, it was tagged as
landuse=military and natural=wood:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/11535026
both are not true on the ground.

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <seav80 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently there is a protected area/nature reserve marked in OSM
> surrounding Mt. Banahaw and Mt. San Cristobal:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/14.0627/121.4957
>
> However, this seems to be based on elevation contour lines and not the
> actual legislation which is R.A. 9847:
> http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2009/ra_9847_2009.html
>
> I think we can modify this to match the law? Note however that the law
> is in PRS92 instead of WGS84, and I don't trust LawPhil to get the
> coordinates right—their copy of the Philippine baselines law (R.A.
> 9522) is wrong.
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
------------------------------------------------------
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
------------------------------------------------------