[Talk-ro] Import CLC
Constantin Popescu
popescu.constantin at gmail.com
Mon Dec 6 15:47:44 GMT 2010
Acum sper sa fie ok. Am adaugat tag-urile de la poligonul vechi.
2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu <popescu.constantin la gmail.com>
> Salut Cristi. Inca nu am pus tag-urile noi dar am sa le adaug.
>
> 2010/12/6 Cristian Draghici <cristian.draghici la gmail.com>
>
> Discutia a fost ca CLC nu defineste limite administrative si ca poligonele
>> cultura.ro raman si sunt redenumite (cu pre-CLC).
>>
>> *Acum Deva nu mai are limita administrativa.*
>> Ati sters poligonul vechi dar proprietatile "boundary" = "administrative"
>> , "siruta:code" = 86696, "place=city" nu le-ati transferat pe poligonul nou.
>>
>> Poligonul nou nu are nici un atribut care sa-l lege de orasul Deva - e
>> doar o zona colorata gri.
>>
>> "siruta:code" facea legatura intre un poligon administrativ si orasul sau
>> (pentru ca siruta:code apare si pe punctul care reprezinta centrul orasului
>> - place=town).
>>
>>
>> Cu multumiri,
>> --
>> Cristi
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu <popescu.constantin la gmail.com>
>>
>> Ok, asa mi se pare si mie cel mai corect. Mersi
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU <stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>>>
>>>> Atunci cred ca ar trebui puse tag-urile de boundary pe celalalt poligon,
>>>> si sters cel necorespunzator.
>>>>
>>>> Din cate vad eu, vechiul poligon de landuse nu are puncte comune cu
>>>> altele, deci ar merge pur si simplu sters.
>>>>
>>>> Stefan.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:45, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Am observat si eu asta. Am vazut ca ai si corectat. Insa intrebarea mea
>>>>> ramane: care e utilitatea acestui poligon atata vreme cat limitele lui
>>>>> nu sunt corecte si mai mult, exista deja o delimitare mult mai corecta
>>>>> prin aceste poligoane care au fost importate de catre tine.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU <stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Din cate am vazut, vechiul poligon de landuse
>>>>> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/53197617) nu mai avea
>>>>> tag-urile de boundary, pe care le-am pus eu acum.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stefan.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:32, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Intrebarea mea e atunci, e vreo problema daca o sterg ? In cazul
>>>>> orasului Deva, limitele acestui poligon oricum nu sunt corecte.
>>>>> Stiu ca
>>>>> inainte de acest import masiv orice sursa de date era buna, fie
>>>>> ea si
>>>>> invizibila. Dar acum cu atatea poligoane, mai sunt acestea
>>>>> necesare ? Nu
>>>>> stiu in alte orase, dar stiu ca in cazul meu, stergerea acestuia
>>>>> m-ar
>>>>> ajuta enorm.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU <stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Da, stiu. Inainte de import, eu am incercat sa le modific pe
>>>>> toate
>>>>> in asa fel incat sa respecte pattern-ul descris in mailul
>>>>> naterior
>>>>> dar, fie mi-au scapat, fie au fost re-modificate dupa.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stefan.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:24, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Si totusi in unele cazuri au :) Am atasat o poza cu unul
>>>>> din
>>>>> cazuri. Nu
>>>>> as vrea sa sterg ceva ceva ce e folositor, dar deja sunt
>>>>> foarte
>>>>> multe
>>>>> pologoane.
>>>>>
>>>>> In cazul JOSM, ai dreptate, se pare ca JOSM nu sterge
>>>>> latura comuna.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU <stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>
>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Salut,
>>>>>
>>>>> Din discutiile mai vechi, o idee era ca poligoanele
>>>>> importate de la
>>>>> "cultura.ro <http://cultura.ro> <http://cultura.ro>
>>>>> <http://cultura.ro>" (sursa
>>>>>
>>>>> Mircea Angelescu), sa nu
>>>>>
>>>>> aiba landuse=residential, ci doar
>>>>> boundary=administrative, si
>>>>> celelalte tag-uri conexe.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nici eu nu m-am prins cum sa sterg un way fara sa
>>>>> sterg si
>>>>> punctele
>>>>> componente. Am remarcat insa ca JOSM nu va sterge
>>>>> punctele
>>>>> care sunt
>>>>> folosite si in alte poligoane, dar nu sunt 100%
>>>>> sigur ca
>>>>> asta e regula.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stefan.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/12/2010 14:50, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Salut,
>>>>>
>>>>> Vin si eu cu cateva intrebari si nelamuriri. In
>>>>> urma acestui
>>>>> import in
>>>>> orasul meu exista acum doua poligoane cu
>>>>> landuse=residential.
>>>>> Primul din
>>>>> ele, cu sursa "Mircea Anglescu" cred ca e inutil
>>>>> in acest
>>>>> moment. Cum
>>>>> pot sterge acel poligon fara sa sterg si un alt
>>>>> eventual
>>>>> poligon
>>>>> care
>>>>> are o latura comuna cu acesta ? Folosesc JOSM si
>>>>> nu
>>>>> mi-am dat
>>>>> seama cum
>>>>> pot face asta. Vreau sa il sterg pentru ca
>>>>> poligonul de
>>>>> CORINE e
>>>>> mult
>>>>> mai precis, si acolo unde nu e corect, poate fi
>>>>> corectat mai
>>>>> usor decat
>>>>> cel vechi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Multumesc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:
>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:
>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>
>>
>
-------------- partea urm�toare --------------
Un ata�ament HTML a fost eliminat
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ro/attachments/20101206/50d5e25f/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Talk-ro
mailing list