[Talk-ro] Import CLC
Constantin Popescu
popescu.constantin at gmail.com
Mon Dec 6 15:25:32 GMT 2010
Salut Cristi. Inca nu am pus tag-urile noi dar am sa le adaug.
2010/12/6 Cristian Draghici <cristian.draghici la gmail.com>
> Discutia a fost ca CLC nu defineste limite administrative si ca poligonele
> cultura.ro raman si sunt redenumite (cu pre-CLC).
>
> *Acum Deva nu mai are limita administrativa.*
> Ati sters poligonul vechi dar proprietatile "boundary" = "administrative" ,
> "siruta:code" = 86696, "place=city" nu le-ati transferat pe poligonul nou.
>
> Poligonul nou nu are nici un atribut care sa-l lege de orasul Deva - e doar
> o zona colorata gri.
>
> "siruta:code" facea legatura intre un poligon administrativ si orasul sau
> (pentru ca siruta:code apare si pe punctul care reprezinta centrul orasului
> - place=town).
>
>
> Cu multumiri,
> --
> Cristi
>
>
>
> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu <popescu.constantin la gmail.com>
>
> Ok, asa mi se pare si mie cel mai corect. Mersi
>>
>>
>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU <stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>>
>>> Atunci cred ca ar trebui puse tag-urile de boundary pe celalalt poligon,
>>> si sters cel necorespunzator.
>>>
>>> Din cate vad eu, vechiul poligon de landuse nu are puncte comune cu
>>> altele, deci ar merge pur si simplu sters.
>>>
>>> Stefan.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/12/2010 16:45, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am observat si eu asta. Am vazut ca ai si corectat. Insa intrebarea mea
>>>> ramane: care e utilitatea acestui poligon atata vreme cat limitele lui
>>>> nu sunt corecte si mai mult, exista deja o delimitare mult mai corecta
>>>> prin aceste poligoane care au fost importate de catre tine.
>>>>
>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU <stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>
>>>>
>>>> Din cate am vazut, vechiul poligon de landuse
>>>> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/53197617) nu mai avea
>>>> tag-urile de boundary, pe care le-am pus eu acum.
>>>>
>>>> Stefan.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:32, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Intrebarea mea e atunci, e vreo problema daca o sterg ? In cazul
>>>> orasului Deva, limitele acestui poligon oricum nu sunt corecte.
>>>> Stiu ca
>>>> inainte de acest import masiv orice sursa de date era buna, fie
>>>> ea si
>>>> invizibila. Dar acum cu atatea poligoane, mai sunt acestea
>>>> necesare ? Nu
>>>> stiu in alte orase, dar stiu ca in cazul meu, stergerea acestuia
>>>> m-ar
>>>> ajuta enorm.
>>>>
>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU <stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>>
>>>>
>>>> Da, stiu. Inainte de import, eu am incercat sa le modific pe
>>>> toate
>>>> in asa fel incat sa respecte pattern-ul descris in mailul
>>>> naterior
>>>> dar, fie mi-au scapat, fie au fost re-modificate dupa.
>>>>
>>>> Stefan.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:24, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Si totusi in unele cazuri au :) Am atasat o poza cu unul
>>>> din
>>>> cazuri. Nu
>>>> as vrea sa sterg ceva ceva ce e folositor, dar deja sunt
>>>> foarte
>>>> multe
>>>> pologoane.
>>>>
>>>> In cazul JOSM, ai dreptate, se pare ca JOSM nu sterge
>>>> latura comuna.
>>>>
>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU <stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>
>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Salut,
>>>>
>>>> Din discutiile mai vechi, o idee era ca poligoanele
>>>> importate de la
>>>> "cultura.ro <http://cultura.ro> <http://cultura.ro>
>>>> <http://cultura.ro>" (sursa
>>>>
>>>> Mircea Angelescu), sa nu
>>>>
>>>> aiba landuse=residential, ci doar
>>>> boundary=administrative, si
>>>> celelalte tag-uri conexe.
>>>>
>>>> Nici eu nu m-am prins cum sa sterg un way fara sa
>>>> sterg si
>>>> punctele
>>>> componente. Am remarcat insa ca JOSM nu va sterge
>>>> punctele
>>>> care sunt
>>>> folosite si in alte poligoane, dar nu sunt 100% sigur
>>>> ca
>>>> asta e regula.
>>>>
>>>> Stefan.
>>>>
>>>> On 06/12/2010 14:50, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Salut,
>>>>
>>>> Vin si eu cu cateva intrebari si nelamuriri. In
>>>> urma acestui
>>>> import in
>>>> orasul meu exista acum doua poligoane cu
>>>> landuse=residential.
>>>> Primul din
>>>> ele, cu sursa "Mircea Anglescu" cred ca e inutil
>>>> in acest
>>>> moment. Cum
>>>> pot sterge acel poligon fara sa sterg si un alt
>>>> eventual
>>>> poligon
>>>> care
>>>> are o latura comuna cu acesta ? Folosesc JOSM si
>>>> nu
>>>> mi-am dat
>>>> seama cum
>>>> pot face asta. Vreau sa il sterg pentru ca
>>>> poligonul de
>>>> CORINE e
>>>> mult
>>>> mai precis, si acolo unde nu e corect, poate fi
>>>> corectat mai
>>>> usor decat
>>>> cel vechi.
>>>>
>>>> Multumesc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:
>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:
>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ro mailing list
> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>
>
-------------- partea urm�toare --------------
Un ata�ament HTML a fost eliminat
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ro/attachments/20101206/fa806ba8/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Talk-ro
mailing list