[Talk-ro] Import CLC
Cristian Draghici
cristian.draghici at gmail.com
Fri Dec 10 07:09:51 GMT 2010
Pe thread-ul de felicitari, multumim Stefan.
Arata grozav!
--
Cristi
2010/12/7 Rares Rusu <rares.rusu la gmx.de>
> Ștefan, felicitări pentru import.
>
> Am observat și eu niște zone cu probleme (o zonă comercială marcată ca
> fiind carieră - probabil imaginile au fost luate în timp ce era în șantier),
> dar per total rezultatul este impresionant.
>
>
> Numai bine,
>
> Rareș
>
>
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
>
> Von: Stefan UNGUREANU
>
> Gesendet: 07.12.10 08:44 Uhr
>
> An: OSM Romania
>
> Betreff: Re: [Talk-ro] Import CLC
>
> Din pacate datele importate nu sunt intotdeauna corecte. De ex, undeva
> langa Campina, am gasit o mare zona rezidentiala care apare in CLC ca
> lac. Nu am avut inca timp sa vad daca problema e la conversiile de la
> CLC la OSM, dar e oricum bizar.
>
> Daca mai observati zone cu elemente bizare, sa-mi trimiteti un link ca
> sa vad ce nu a mers bine la import.
>
> Sper ca astazi sa termin si apele si sa incep pagina de wiki pentru
> discutii.
>
> Stefan.
>
> On 07/12/2010 08:26, Ioan Indreias wrote:
> > Excelent - sper ca toti care se gandesc la stergeri sa procedeze la
> > fel. Ideea este sa pastram informatiile utile de la ce se considera a
> > nu mai fi un poligon de actualitate.
> >
> > In alta ordine de idei multumim lui Stefan pentru efortul depus.
> >
> > Toate bune,
> > Nini.
> >
> > 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin la gmail.com>:
> >> Acum sper sa fie ok. Am adaugat tag-urile de la poligonul vechi.
> >>
> >> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin la gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> Salut Cristi. Inca nu am pus tag-urile noi dar am sa le adaug.
> >>>
> >>> 2010/12/6 Cristian Draghici<cristian.draghici la gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Discutia a fost ca CLC nu defineste limite administrative si ca
> >>>> poligonele cultura.ro raman si sunt redenumite (cu pre-CLC).
> >>>> Acum Deva nu mai are limita administrativa.
> >>>> Ati sters poligonul vechi dar proprietatile "boundary" = "administrative"
> >>>> , "siruta:code" = 86696, "place=city" nu le-ati transferat pe poligonul nou.
> >>>> Poligonul nou nu are nici un atribut care sa-l lege de orasul Deva - e
> >>>> doar o zona colorata gri.
> >>>> "siruta:code" facea legatura intre un poligon administrativ si orasul sau
> >>>> (pentru ca siruta:code apare si pe punctul care reprezinta centrul orasului
> >>>> - place=town).
> >>>>
> >>>> Cu multumiri,
> >>>> --
> >>>> Cristi
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin la gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ok, asa mi se pare si mie cel mai corect. Mersi
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Atunci cred ca ar trebui puse tag-urile de boundary pe celalalt
> >>>>>> poligon, si sters cel necorespunzator.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Din cate vad eu, vechiul poligon de landuse nu are puncte comune cu
> >>>>>> altele, deci ar merge pur si simplu sters.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Stefan.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:45, Constantin Popescu wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Am observat si eu asta. Am vazut ca ai si corectat. Insa intrebarea
> >>>>>>> mea
> >>>>>>> ramane: care e utilitatea acestui poligon atata vreme cat limitele lui
> >>>>>>> nu sunt corecte si mai mult, exista deja o delimitare mult mai corecta
> >>>>>>> prin aceste poligoane care au fost importate de catre tine.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Din cate am vazut, vechiul poligon de landuse
> >>>>>>> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/53197617) nu mai avea
> >>>>>>> tag-urile de boundary, pe care le-am pus eu acum.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Stefan.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:32, Constantin Popescu wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Intrebarea mea e atunci, e vreo problema daca o sterg ? In
> >>>>>>> cazul
> >>>>>>> orasului Deva, limitele acestui poligon oricum nu sunt corecte.
> >>>>>>> Stiu ca
> >>>>>>> inainte de acest import masiv orice sursa de date era buna, fie
> >>>>>>> ea si
> >>>>>>> invizibila. Dar acum cu atatea poligoane, mai sunt acestea
> >>>>>>> necesare ? Nu
> >>>>>>> stiu in alte orase, dar stiu ca in cazul meu, stergerea
> >>>>>>> acestuia
> >>>>>>> m-ar
> >>>>>>> ajuta enorm.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Da, stiu. Inainte de import, eu am incercat sa le modific
> >>>>>>> pe
> >>>>>>> toate
> >>>>>>> in asa fel incat sa respecte pattern-ul descris in mailul
> >>>>>>> naterior
> >>>>>>> dar, fie mi-au scapat, fie au fost re-modificate dupa.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Stefan.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:24, Constantin Popescu wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Si totusi in unele cazuri au :) Am atasat o poza cu
> >>>>>>> unul din
> >>>>>>> cazuri. Nu
> >>>>>>> as vrea sa sterg ceva ceva ce e folositor, dar deja
> >>>>>>> sunt
> >>>>>>> foarte
> >>>>>>> multe
> >>>>>>> pologoane.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In cazul JOSM, ai dreptate, se pare ca JOSM nu sterge
> >>>>>>> latura comuna.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Salut,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Din discutiile mai vechi, o idee era ca poligoanele
> >>>>>>> importate de la
> >>>>>>> "cultura.ro<http://cultura.ro> <http://cultura.ro>
> >>>>>>> <http://cultura.ro>" (sursa
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Mircea Angelescu), sa nu
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> aiba landuse=residential, ci doar
> >>>>>>> boundary=administrative, si
> >>>>>>> celelalte tag-uri conexe.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Nici eu nu m-am prins cum sa sterg un way fara sa
> >>>>>>> sterg si
> >>>>>>> punctele
> >>>>>>> componente. Am remarcat insa ca JOSM nu va sterge
> >>>>>>> punctele
> >>>>>>> care sunt
> >>>>>>> folosite si in alte poligoane, dar nu sunt 100%
> >>>>>>> sigur ca
> >>>>>>> asta e regula.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Stefan.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 14:50, Constantin Popescu wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Salut,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Vin si eu cu cateva intrebari si nelamuriri. In
> >>>>>>> urma acestui
> >>>>>>> import in
> >>>>>>> orasul meu exista acum doua poligoane cu
> >>>>>>> landuse=residential.
> >>>>>>> Primul din
> >>>>>>> ele, cu sursa "Mircea Anglescu" cred ca e
> >>>>>>> inutil
> >>>>>>> in acest
> >>>>>>> moment. Cum
> >>>>>>> pot sterge acel poligon fara sa sterg si un alt
> >>>>>>> eventual
> >>>>>>> poligon
> >>>>>>> care
> >>>>>>> are o latura comuna cu acesta ? Folosesc JOSM
> >>>>>>> si nu
> >>>>>>> mi-am dat
> >>>>>>> seama cum
> >>>>>>> pot face asta. Vreau sa il sterg pentru ca
> >>>>>>> poligonul de
> >>>>>>> CORINE e
> >>>>>>> mult
> >>>>>>> mai precis, si acolo unde nu e corect, poate fi
> >>>>>>> corectat mai
> >>>>>>> usor decat
> >>>>>>> cel vechi.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Multumesc.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
> >>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
> >>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Talk-ro mailing list
> >>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Talk-ro mailing list
> >> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-ro mailing list
> > Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ro mailing list Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ro mailing list
> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>
>
-------------- partea urm�toare --------------
Un ata�ament HTML a fost eliminat
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ro/attachments/20101210/c1806b9d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Talk-ro
mailing list