[Talk-ro] Import CLC
Constantin Popescu
popescu.constantin at gmail.com
Fri Dec 10 07:13:10 GMT 2010
Legat de acest import foarte bine realizat si cu rezultate foarte bune, nu
putem propune acest import pentru "*Image of the week" ?
Eu cred ca e un import foarte important si ar trebui mentionat si in alta
parte decat natinal.
*
2010/12/10 Cristian Draghici <cristian.draghici la gmail.com>
> Pe thread-ul de felicitari, multumim Stefan.
>
> Arata grozav!
>
> --
> Cristi
>
>
> 2010/12/7 Rares Rusu <rares.rusu la gmx.de>
>
>> Ștefan, felicitări pentru import.
>>
>> Am observat și eu niște zone cu probleme (o zonă comercială marcată ca
>> fiind carieră - probabil imaginile au fost luate în timp ce era în șantier),
>> dar per total rezultatul este impresionant.
>>
>>
>> Numai bine,
>>
>> Rareș
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
>>
>> Von: Stefan UNGUREANU
>>
>> Gesendet: 07.12.10 08:44 Uhr
>>
>> An: OSM Romania
>>
>> Betreff: Re: [Talk-ro] Import CLC
>>
>>
>> Din pacate datele importate nu sunt intotdeauna corecte. De ex, undeva
>> langa Campina, am gasit o mare zona rezidentiala care apare in CLC ca
>> lac. Nu am avut inca timp sa vad daca problema e la conversiile de la
>> CLC la OSM, dar e oricum bizar.
>>
>> Daca mai observati zone cu elemente bizare, sa-mi trimiteti un link ca
>> sa vad ce nu a mers bine la import.
>>
>> Sper ca astazi sa termin si apele si sa incep pagina de wiki pentru
>> discutii.
>>
>> Stefan.
>>
>> On 07/12/2010 08:26, Ioan Indreias wrote:
>> > Excelent - sper ca toti care se gandesc la stergeri sa procedeze la
>> > fel. Ideea este sa pastram informatiile utile de la ce se considera a
>> > nu mai fi un poligon de actualitate.
>> >
>> > In alta ordine de idei multumim lui Stefan pentru efortul depus.
>> >
>> > Toate bune,
>> > Nini.
>> >
>> > 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin la gmail.com>:
>> >> Acum sper sa fie ok. Am adaugat tag-urile de la poligonul vechi.
>> >>
>> >> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin la gmail.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> Salut Cristi. Inca nu am pus tag-urile noi dar am sa le adaug.
>> >>>
>> >>> 2010/12/6 Cristian Draghici<cristian.draghici la gmail.com>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Discutia a fost ca CLC nu defineste limite administrative si ca
>> >>>> poligonele cultura.ro raman si sunt redenumite (cu pre-CLC).
>> >>>> Acum Deva nu mai are limita administrativa.
>> >>>> Ati sters poligonul vechi dar proprietatile "boundary" = "administrative"
>> >>>> , "siruta:code" = 86696, "place=city" nu le-ati transferat pe poligonul nou.
>> >>>> Poligonul nou nu are nici un atribut care sa-l lege de orasul Deva - e
>> >>>> doar o zona colorata gri.
>> >>>> "siruta:code" facea legatura intre un poligon administrativ si orasul sau
>> >>>> (pentru ca siruta:code apare si pe punctul care reprezinta centrul orasului
>> >>>> - place=town).
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cu multumiri,
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Cristi
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin la gmail.com>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Ok, asa mi se pare si mie cel mai corect. Mersi
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Atunci cred ca ar trebui puse tag-urile de boundary pe celalalt
>> >>>>>> poligon, si sters cel necorespunzator.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Din cate vad eu, vechiul poligon de landuse nu are puncte comune cu
>> >>>>>> altele, deci ar merge pur si simplu sters.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Stefan.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:45, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Am observat si eu asta. Am vazut ca ai si corectat. Insa intrebarea
>> >>>>>>> mea
>> >>>>>>> ramane: care e utilitatea acestui poligon atata vreme cat limitele lui
>> >>>>>>> nu sunt corecte si mai mult, exista deja o delimitare mult mai corecta
>> >>>>>>> prin aceste poligoane care au fost importate de catre tine.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Din cate am vazut, vechiul poligon de landuse
>> >>>>>>> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/53197617) nu mai avea
>> >>>>>>> tag-urile de boundary, pe care le-am pus eu acum.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Stefan.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:32, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Intrebarea mea e atunci, e vreo problema daca o sterg ? In
>> >>>>>>> cazul
>> >>>>>>> orasului Deva, limitele acestui poligon oricum nu sunt corecte.
>> >>>>>>> Stiu ca
>> >>>>>>> inainte de acest import masiv orice sursa de date era buna, fie
>> >>>>>>> ea si
>> >>>>>>> invizibila. Dar acum cu atatea poligoane, mai sunt acestea
>> >>>>>>> necesare ? Nu
>> >>>>>>> stiu in alte orase, dar stiu ca in cazul meu, stergerea
>> >>>>>>> acestuia
>> >>>>>>> m-ar
>> >>>>>>> ajuta enorm.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Da, stiu. Inainte de import, eu am incercat sa le modific
>> >>>>>>> pe
>> >>>>>>> toate
>> >>>>>>> in asa fel incat sa respecte pattern-ul descris in mailul
>> >>>>>>> naterior
>> >>>>>>> dar, fie mi-au scapat, fie au fost re-modificate dupa.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Stefan.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:24, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Si totusi in unele cazuri au :) Am atasat o poza cu
>> >>>>>>> unul din
>> >>>>>>> cazuri. Nu
>> >>>>>>> as vrea sa sterg ceva ceva ce e folositor, dar deja
>> >>>>>>> sunt
>> >>>>>>> foarte
>> >>>>>>> multe
>> >>>>>>> pologoane.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> In cazul JOSM, ai dreptate, se pare ca JOSM nu sterge
>> >>>>>>> latura comuna.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Salut,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Din discutiile mai vechi, o idee era ca poligoanele
>> >>>>>>> importate de la
>> >>>>>>> "cultura.ro<http://cultura.ro> <http://cultura.ro>
>> >>>>>>> <http://cultura.ro>" (sursa
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Mircea Angelescu), sa nu
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> aiba landuse=residential, ci doar
>> >>>>>>> boundary=administrative, si
>> >>>>>>> celelalte tag-uri conexe.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Nici eu nu m-am prins cum sa sterg un way fara sa
>> >>>>>>> sterg si
>> >>>>>>> punctele
>> >>>>>>> componente. Am remarcat insa ca JOSM nu va sterge
>> >>>>>>> punctele
>> >>>>>>> care sunt
>> >>>>>>> folosite si in alte poligoane, dar nu sunt 100%
>> >>>>>>> sigur ca
>> >>>>>>> asta e regula.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Stefan.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 14:50, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Salut,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Vin si eu cu cateva intrebari si nelamuriri. In
>> >>>>>>> urma acestui
>> >>>>>>> import in
>> >>>>>>> orasul meu exista acum doua poligoane cu
>> >>>>>>> landuse=residential.
>> >>>>>>> Primul din
>> >>>>>>> ele, cu sursa "Mircea Anglescu" cred ca e
>> >>>>>>> inutil
>> >>>>>>> in acest
>> >>>>>>> moment. Cum
>> >>>>>>> pot sterge acel poligon fara sa sterg si un alt
>> >>>>>>> eventual
>> >>>>>>> poligon
>> >>>>>>> care
>> >>>>>>> are o latura comuna cu acesta ? Folosesc JOSM
>> >>>>>>> si nu
>> >>>>>>> mi-am dat
>> >>>>>>> seama cum
>> >>>>>>> pot face asta. Vreau sa il sterg pentru ca
>> >>>>>>> poligonul de
>> >>>>>>> CORINE e
>> >>>>>>> mult
>> >>>>>>> mai precis, si acolo unde nu e corect, poate fi
>> >>>>>>> corectat mai
>> >>>>>>> usor decat
>> >>>>>>> cel vechi.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Multumesc.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> >>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> >>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> >>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Talk-ro mailing list
>> >> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Talk-ro mailing list
>> > Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ro mailing list Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ro mailing list
> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>
>
-------------- partea urm�toare --------------
Un ata�ament HTML a fost eliminat
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ro/attachments/20101210/85a42f9b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Talk-ro
mailing list