[Talk-ro] Import CLC
Constantin Popescu
popescu.constantin at gmail.com
Fri Dec 10 07:22:35 GMT 2010
Aici putem propune imagini pentur IMOTW :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_image_proposals
2010/12/10 Janos Rusiczki <janos.rusiczki la gmail.com>
> Si cum facem asta? Sa propunem importul pentru "image of the week", adica.
> :)
>
> 2010/12/10 Constantin Popescu <popescu.constantin la gmail.com>
>
>> Legat de acest import foarte bine realizat si cu rezultate foarte bune, nu
>> putem propune acest import pentru "*Image of the week" ?
>> Eu cred ca e un import foarte important si ar trebui mentionat si in alta
>> parte decat natinal.
>> *
>> 2010/12/10 Cristian Draghici <cristian.draghici la gmail.com>
>>
>>> Pe thread-ul de felicitari, multumim Stefan.
>>>
>>> Arata grozav!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cristi
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/12/7 Rares Rusu <rares.rusu la gmx.de>
>>>
>>>> Ștefan, felicitări pentru import.
>>>>
>>>> Am observat și eu niște zone cu probleme (o zonă comercială marcată ca
>>>> fiind carieră - probabil imaginile au fost luate în timp ce era în șantier),
>>>> dar per total rezultatul este impresionant.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Numai bine,
>>>>
>>>> Rareș
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
>>>>
>>>> Von: Stefan UNGUREANU
>>>>
>>>> Gesendet: 07.12.10 08:44 Uhr
>>>>
>>>> An: OSM Romania
>>>>
>>>> Betreff: Re: [Talk-ro] Import CLC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Din pacate datele importate nu sunt intotdeauna corecte. De ex, undeva
>>>> langa Campina, am gasit o mare zona rezidentiala care apare in CLC ca
>>>> lac. Nu am avut inca timp sa vad daca problema e la conversiile de la
>>>> CLC la OSM, dar e oricum bizar.
>>>>
>>>> Daca mai observati zone cu elemente bizare, sa-mi trimiteti un link ca
>>>> sa vad ce nu a mers bine la import.
>>>>
>>>> Sper ca astazi sa termin si apele si sa incep pagina de wiki pentru
>>>> discutii.
>>>>
>>>> Stefan.
>>>>
>>>> On 07/12/2010 08:26, Ioan Indreias wrote:
>>>> > Excelent - sper ca toti care se gandesc la stergeri sa procedeze la
>>>> > fel. Ideea este sa pastram informatiile utile de la ce se considera a
>>>> > nu mai fi un poligon de actualitate.
>>>> >
>>>> > In alta ordine de idei multumim lui Stefan pentru efortul depus.
>>>> >
>>>> > Toate bune,
>>>> > Nini.
>>>> >
>>>> > 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin la gmail.com>:
>>>> >> Acum sper sa fie ok. Am adaugat tag-urile de la poligonul vechi.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin la gmail.com>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Salut Cristi. Inca nu am pus tag-urile noi dar am sa le adaug.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 2010/12/6 Cristian Draghici<cristian.draghici la gmail.com>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Discutia a fost ca CLC nu defineste limite administrative si ca
>>>> >>>> poligonele cultura.ro raman si sunt redenumite (cu pre-CLC).
>>>> >>>> Acum Deva nu mai are limita administrativa.
>>>> >>>> Ati sters poligonul vechi dar proprietatile "boundary" = "administrative"
>>>> >>>> , "siruta:code" = 86696, "place=city" nu le-ati transferat pe poligonul nou.
>>>> >>>> Poligonul nou nu are nici un atribut care sa-l lege de orasul Deva - e
>>>> >>>> doar o zona colorata gri.
>>>> >>>> "siruta:code" facea legatura intre un poligon administrativ si orasul sau
>>>> >>>> (pentru ca siruta:code apare si pe punctul care reprezinta centrul orasului
>>>> >>>> - place=town).
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Cu multumiri,
>>>> >>>> --
>>>> >>>> Cristi
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin la gmail.com>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Ok, asa mi se pare si mie cel mai corect. Mersi
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> Atunci cred ca ar trebui puse tag-urile de boundary pe celalalt
>>>> >>>>>> poligon, si sters cel necorespunzator.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> Din cate vad eu, vechiul poligon de landuse nu are puncte comune cu
>>>> >>>>>> altele, deci ar merge pur si simplu sters.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> Stefan.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:45, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Am observat si eu asta. Am vazut ca ai si corectat. Insa intrebarea
>>>> >>>>>>> mea
>>>> >>>>>>> ramane: care e utilitatea acestui poligon atata vreme cat limitele lui
>>>> >>>>>>> nu sunt corecte si mai mult, exista deja o delimitare mult mai corecta
>>>> >>>>>>> prin aceste poligoane care au fost importate de catre tine.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Din cate am vazut, vechiul poligon de landuse
>>>> >>>>>>> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/53197617) nu mai avea
>>>> >>>>>>> tag-urile de boundary, pe care le-am pus eu acum.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Stefan.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:32, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Intrebarea mea e atunci, e vreo problema daca o sterg ? In
>>>> >>>>>>> cazul
>>>> >>>>>>> orasului Deva, limitele acestui poligon oricum nu sunt corecte.
>>>> >>>>>>> Stiu ca
>>>> >>>>>>> inainte de acest import masiv orice sursa de date era buna, fie
>>>> >>>>>>> ea si
>>>> >>>>>>> invizibila. Dar acum cu atatea poligoane, mai sunt acestea
>>>> >>>>>>> necesare ? Nu
>>>> >>>>>>> stiu in alte orase, dar stiu ca in cazul meu, stergerea
>>>> >>>>>>> acestuia
>>>> >>>>>>> m-ar
>>>> >>>>>>> ajuta enorm.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Da, stiu. Inainte de import, eu am incercat sa le modific
>>>> >>>>>>> pe
>>>> >>>>>>> toate
>>>> >>>>>>> in asa fel incat sa respecte pattern-ul descris in mailul
>>>> >>>>>>> naterior
>>>> >>>>>>> dar, fie mi-au scapat, fie au fost re-modificate dupa.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Stefan.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:24, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Si totusi in unele cazuri au :) Am atasat o poza cu
>>>> >>>>>>> unul din
>>>> >>>>>>> cazuri. Nu
>>>> >>>>>>> as vrea sa sterg ceva ceva ce e folositor, dar deja
>>>> >>>>>>> sunt
>>>> >>>>>>> foarte
>>>> >>>>>>> multe
>>>> >>>>>>> pologoane.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> In cazul JOSM, ai dreptate, se pare ca JOSM nu sterge
>>>> >>>>>>> latura comuna.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu la mytrek.ro>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Salut,
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Din discutiile mai vechi, o idee era ca poligoanele
>>>> >>>>>>> importate de la
>>>> >>>>>>> "cultura.ro<http://cultura.ro> <http://cultura.ro>
>>>> >>>>>>> <http://cultura.ro>" (sursa
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Mircea Angelescu), sa nu
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> aiba landuse=residential, ci doar
>>>> >>>>>>> boundary=administrative, si
>>>> >>>>>>> celelalte tag-uri conexe.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Nici eu nu m-am prins cum sa sterg un way fara sa
>>>> >>>>>>> sterg si
>>>> >>>>>>> punctele
>>>> >>>>>>> componente. Am remarcat insa ca JOSM nu va sterge
>>>> >>>>>>> punctele
>>>> >>>>>>> care sunt
>>>> >>>>>>> folosite si in alte poligoane, dar nu sunt 100%
>>>> >>>>>>> sigur ca
>>>> >>>>>>> asta e regula.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Stefan.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 14:50, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Salut,
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Vin si eu cu cateva intrebari si nelamuriri. In
>>>> >>>>>>> urma acestui
>>>> >>>>>>> import in
>>>> >>>>>>> orasul meu exista acum doua poligoane cu
>>>> >>>>>>> landuse=residential.
>>>> >>>>>>> Primul din
>>>> >>>>>>> ele, cu sursa "Mircea Anglescu" cred ca e
>>>> >>>>>>> inutil
>>>> >>>>>>> in acest
>>>> >>>>>>> moment. Cum
>>>> >>>>>>> pot sterge acel poligon fara sa sterg si un alt
>>>> >>>>>>> eventual
>>>> >>>>>>> poligon
>>>> >>>>>>> care
>>>> >>>>>>> are o latura comuna cu acesta ? Folosesc JOSM
>>>> >>>>>>> si nu
>>>> >>>>>>> mi-am dat
>>>> >>>>>>> seama cum
>>>> >>>>>>> pot face asta. Vreau sa il sterg pentru ca
>>>> >>>>>>> poligonul de
>>>> >>>>>>> CORINE e
>>>> >>>>>>> mult
>>>> >>>>>>> mai precis, si acolo unde nu e corect, poate fi
>>>> >>>>>>> corectat mai
>>>> >>>>>>> usor decat
>>>> >>>>>>> cel vechi.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Multumesc.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>>
>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org>
>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> >>>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> >>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> >>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> >> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> > Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ro mailing list Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ro mailing list
> Talk-ro la openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>
>
-------------- partea urm�toare --------------
Un ata�ament HTML a fost eliminat
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ro/attachments/20101210/8d35576c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Talk-ro
mailing list