[Talk-ro] Import CLC
Janos Rusiczki
janos.rusiczki at gmail.com
Fri Dec 10 07:17:46 GMT 2010
Si cum facem asta? Sa propunem importul pentru "image of the week", adica.
:)
2010/12/10 Constantin Popescu <popescu.constantin at gmail.com>
> Legat de acest import foarte bine realizat si cu rezultate foarte bune, nu
> putem propune acest import pentru "*Image of the week" ?
> Eu cred ca e un import foarte important si ar trebui mentionat si in alta
> parte decat natinal.
> *
> 2010/12/10 Cristian Draghici <cristian.draghici at gmail.com>
>
>> Pe thread-ul de felicitari, multumim Stefan.
>>
>> Arata grozav!
>>
>> --
>> Cristi
>>
>>
>> 2010/12/7 Rares Rusu <rares.rusu at gmx.de>
>>
>>> Ștefan, felicitări pentru import.
>>>
>>> Am observat și eu niște zone cu probleme (o zonă comercială marcată ca
>>> fiind carieră - probabil imaginile au fost luate în timp ce era în șantier),
>>> dar per total rezultatul este impresionant.
>>>
>>>
>>> Numai bine,
>>>
>>> Rareș
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
>>>
>>> Von: Stefan UNGUREANU
>>>
>>> Gesendet: 07.12.10 08:44 Uhr
>>>
>>> An: OSM Romania
>>>
>>> Betreff: Re: [Talk-ro] Import CLC
>>>
>>> Din pacate datele importate nu sunt intotdeauna corecte. De ex, undeva
>>> langa Campina, am gasit o mare zona rezidentiala care apare in CLC ca
>>> lac. Nu am avut inca timp sa vad daca problema e la conversiile de la
>>> CLC la OSM, dar e oricum bizar.
>>>
>>> Daca mai observati zone cu elemente bizare, sa-mi trimiteti un link ca
>>> sa vad ce nu a mers bine la import.
>>>
>>> Sper ca astazi sa termin si apele si sa incep pagina de wiki pentru
>>> discutii.
>>>
>>> Stefan.
>>>
>>> On 07/12/2010 08:26, Ioan Indreias wrote:
>>> > Excelent - sper ca toti care se gandesc la stergeri sa procedeze la
>>> > fel. Ideea este sa pastram informatiile utile de la ce se considera a
>>> > nu mai fi un poligon de actualitate.
>>> >
>>> > In alta ordine de idei multumim lui Stefan pentru efortul depus.
>>> >
>>> > Toate bune,
>>> > Nini.
>>> >
>>> > 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin at gmail.com>:
>>> >> Acum sper sa fie ok. Am adaugat tag-urile de la poligonul vechi.
>>> >>
>>> >> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin at gmail.com>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Salut Cristi. Inca nu am pus tag-urile noi dar am sa le adaug.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 2010/12/6 Cristian Draghici<cristian.draghici at gmail.com>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Discutia a fost ca CLC nu defineste limite administrative si ca
>>> >>>> poligonele cultura.ro raman si sunt redenumite (cu pre-CLC).
>>> >>>> Acum Deva nu mai are limita administrativa.
>>> >>>> Ati sters poligonul vechi dar proprietatile "boundary" = "administrative"
>>> >>>> , "siruta:code" = 86696, "place=city" nu le-ati transferat pe poligonul nou.
>>> >>>> Poligonul nou nu are nici un atribut care sa-l lege de orasul Deva - e
>>> >>>> doar o zona colorata gri.
>>> >>>> "siruta:code" facea legatura intre un poligon administrativ si orasul sau
>>> >>>> (pentru ca siruta:code apare si pe punctul care reprezinta centrul orasului
>>> >>>> - place=town).
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Cu multumiri,
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> Cristi
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 2010/12/6 Constantin Popescu<popescu.constantin at gmail.com>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Ok, asa mi se pare si mie cel mai corect. Mersi
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Atunci cred ca ar trebui puse tag-urile de boundary pe celalalt
>>> >>>>>> poligon, si sters cel necorespunzator.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Din cate vad eu, vechiul poligon de landuse nu are puncte comune cu
>>> >>>>>> altele, deci ar merge pur si simplu sters.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Stefan.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:45, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Am observat si eu asta. Am vazut ca ai si corectat. Insa intrebarea
>>> >>>>>>> mea
>>> >>>>>>> ramane: care e utilitatea acestui poligon atata vreme cat limitele lui
>>> >>>>>>> nu sunt corecte si mai mult, exista deja o delimitare mult mai corecta
>>> >>>>>>> prin aceste poligoane care au fost importate de catre tine.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Din cate am vazut, vechiul poligon de landuse
>>> >>>>>>> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/53197617) nu mai avea
>>> >>>>>>> tag-urile de boundary, pe care le-am pus eu acum.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Stefan.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:32, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Intrebarea mea e atunci, e vreo problema daca o sterg ? In
>>> >>>>>>> cazul
>>> >>>>>>> orasului Deva, limitele acestui poligon oricum nu sunt corecte.
>>> >>>>>>> Stiu ca
>>> >>>>>>> inainte de acest import masiv orice sursa de date era buna, fie
>>> >>>>>>> ea si
>>> >>>>>>> invizibila. Dar acum cu atatea poligoane, mai sunt acestea
>>> >>>>>>> necesare ? Nu
>>> >>>>>>> stiu in alte orase, dar stiu ca in cazul meu, stergerea
>>> >>>>>>> acestuia
>>> >>>>>>> m-ar
>>> >>>>>>> ajuta enorm.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Da, stiu. Inainte de import, eu am incercat sa le modific
>>> >>>>>>> pe
>>> >>>>>>> toate
>>> >>>>>>> in asa fel incat sa respecte pattern-ul descris in mailul
>>> >>>>>>> naterior
>>> >>>>>>> dar, fie mi-au scapat, fie au fost re-modificate dupa.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Stefan.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 16:24, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Si totusi in unele cazuri au :) Am atasat o poza cu
>>> >>>>>>> unul din
>>> >>>>>>> cazuri. Nu
>>> >>>>>>> as vrea sa sterg ceva ceva ce e folositor, dar deja
>>> >>>>>>> sunt
>>> >>>>>>> foarte
>>> >>>>>>> multe
>>> >>>>>>> pologoane.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> In cazul JOSM, ai dreptate, se pare ca JOSM nu sterge
>>> >>>>>>> latura comuna.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> 2010/12/6 Stefan UNGUREANU<stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>>
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Salut,
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Din discutiile mai vechi, o idee era ca poligoanele
>>> >>>>>>> importate de la
>>> >>>>>>> "cultura.ro<http://cultura.ro> <http://cultura.ro>
>>> >>>>>>> <http://cultura.ro>" (sursa
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Mircea Angelescu), sa nu
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> aiba landuse=residential, ci doar
>>> >>>>>>> boundary=administrative, si
>>> >>>>>>> celelalte tag-uri conexe.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Nici eu nu m-am prins cum sa sterg un way fara sa
>>> >>>>>>> sterg si
>>> >>>>>>> punctele
>>> >>>>>>> componente. Am remarcat insa ca JOSM nu va sterge
>>> >>>>>>> punctele
>>> >>>>>>> care sunt
>>> >>>>>>> folosite si in alte poligoane, dar nu sunt 100%
>>> >>>>>>> sigur ca
>>> >>>>>>> asta e regula.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Stefan.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2010 14:50, Constantin Popescu wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Salut,
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Vin si eu cu cateva intrebari si nelamuriri. In
>>> >>>>>>> urma acestui
>>> >>>>>>> import in
>>> >>>>>>> orasul meu exista acum doua poligoane cu
>>> >>>>>>> landuse=residential.
>>> >>>>>>> Primul din
>>> >>>>>>> ele, cu sursa "Mircea Anglescu" cred ca e
>>> >>>>>>> inutil
>>> >>>>>>> in acest
>>> >>>>>>> moment. Cum
>>> >>>>>>> pot sterge acel poligon fara sa sterg si un alt
>>> >>>>>>> eventual
>>> >>>>>>> poligon
>>> >>>>>>> care
>>> >>>>>>> are o latura comuna cu acesta ? Folosesc JOSM
>>> >>>>>>> si nu
>>> >>>>>>> mi-am dat
>>> >>>>>>> seama cum
>>> >>>>>>> pot face asta. Vreau sa il sterg pentru ca
>>> >>>>>>> poligonul de
>>> >>>>>>> CORINE e
>>> >>>>>>> mult
>>> >>>>>>> mai precis, si acolo unde nu e corect, poate fi
>>> >>>>>>> corectat mai
>>> >>>>>>> usor decat
>>> >>>>>>> cel vechi.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Multumesc.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>>
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>>
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>>
>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >>>>>>> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>>
>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> >>>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> >>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> >>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> >>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> >> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Talk-ro mailing list
>>> > Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ro mailing list Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Talk-ro mailing list
>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ro mailing list
> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ro/attachments/20101210/9619b6eb/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Talk-ro
mailing list