[Talk-ro] CLC stricat la nord de Baia Mare
Janos Rusiczki
janos.rusiczki at gmail.com
Tue Apr 30 11:57:49 UTC 2013
E in proces de update. Unele tile-uri au fost randate, altele nu.
Rabdare si isi va reveni.
2013/4/30 Razvan <radulescu.razvan at gmail.com>
> Da am vazut acum ca apare si dispare de la un nivel de zoom la altul.
>
>
> On 30.04.2013 12:50, Cristian Draghici wrote:
>
> Am facut inca o verificare.
>
> La zoom level 13 la nord de Baia Mare de exemplu apare o problema de
> randare - dar nu are legatura cu relatia care defineste multipoligonul de
> tip padure.
> Pentru verificare am creat un segment intr-o tila in care aparea lipsa
> padurii si la cateva minute dupa salvare s-a randat corect (vezi poza).
>
> Intre timp am sters segmentul ca sa nu ramane mizerii in DB.
>
> Referitor la lipsa instrumentelor necesare, nu e nimic magic in API-ul
> pe care l-a folosit importer-ul de CLC.
> Tot ce a facut se poate face (poate cu ceva mai mult efort) cu editoarele
> grafice si cu toolset-ul OSM (istorie, browse, etc).
>
> Salutari
> --
> Cristi
>
>
> 2013/4/30 Cristian Draghici <cristian.draghici at gmail.com>
>
>> Ce nu functioneaza?
>> La mine apare padure in zona respectiva:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.865&lon=23.51&zoom=10&layers=M
>>
>> Verifica cache-ul browser-ului, Chrome cel putin are probleme la
>> caching de tile.
>>
>>
>> 2013/4/30 Razvan <radulescu.razvan at gmail.com>
>>
>>> Nu, tot nu functioneaza. E totul alb pe acolo. Nu cred ca ai la
>>> indemana instrumentele necesare ca sa mai repari asa ceva. Poate numai
>>> botul care a facut importurile...
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30.04.2013 11:42, Ioan Indreias wrote:
>>>
>>> Eu zic ca am reparat -
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1290220
>>>
>>> Daca sunt ceva inconsistente dati-mi de stire si corectam.
>>>
>>> Nini
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/4/30 Ioan Indreias <indreias at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> Salut Stefan,
>>>>
>>>> Am fi avut nevoie de ajutor daca nu gaseam changeset-ul in care s-a
>>>> definit relatia - acum ca s-a gasit nu mai avem nevoie de ajutorul tau. Se
>>>> pune totusi intrebarea daca ai cumva o lista parsabila cu continutul
>>>> importului CLC - in pagina de wiki mentionai ceva despre un DB...
>>>>
>>>> Multumesc,
>>>> Nini
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/4/30 Stefan UNGUREANU <stefan.ungureanu at mytrek.ro>
>>>>
>>>>> Salut,
>>>>>
>>>>> Problema poligoanelor mari este mult prea complexa. Am intors-o pe
>>>>> toate
>>>>> partile atunci si singura solutie viabila au fost relatiile.
>>>>>
>>>>> In momentul importului toate erau procesate corect si valide.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stefan.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, April 30, 2013 08:28, Razvan wrote:
>>>>> > Salut.
>>>>> > Problema pe viitor este dupa cum am mai spus ca acest import CLC a
>>>>> creat
>>>>> > zone multipoligon muult prea mari. Greseli facute de useri incepatori
>>>>> > sau nu, vor mai fi probabil. Si deci exista riscul sa se strice din
>>>>> nou.
>>>>> > De aceea ziceam ca daca ar fi fost facute pe zone mult mai mici nu
>>>>> ar fi
>>>>> > creat probleme asa mari si s-ar fi putut repara mai usor o zona.
>>>>> > Eu nu inteleg cum sunt facute aceste zone multipoligon. Am vazut ca o
>>>>> > delimitare de zona oricare ar fi, de oras, rezidentiala, de paduri,
>>>>> > chiar si o cladire - pana nu este inchisa bucla complet nu se
>>>>> activeaza.
>>>>> > Ori aceste zone de import CLC sunt alcatuite din foarte multe
>>>>> segmente
>>>>> > dar niciunele nu sunt lipite ca sa formeze o bucla inchisa. Si totusi
>>>>> > functioneaza... Adica sunt prinse intre ele dar nu formeaza toate la
>>>>> un
>>>>> > loc o singura linie.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 30.04.2013 00:38, Ioan Indreias wrote:
>>>>> >> Salut,
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Am facut ceva investigatii si, din ce inteleg eu, avem urmatoarele
>>>>> >> way-uri care au pierdut "legatura" cu o relatie de tip multipoligon
>>>>> >> (fiind foarte mari probabil s-a ales impartirea poligonului) - cel
>>>>> mai
>>>>> >> probabil cineva a sters relatia din greseala.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/86813971
>>>>> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/86813972
>>>>> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/86814003
>>>>> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/86814004
>>>>> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/86814007
>>>>> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/86814027
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Incercam maine sa gasim datele despre relatia pierduta - poate ne
>>>>> >> ajuta http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Stefanu? Sau oricine
>>>>> >> care are date de la importul respectiv.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Toate bune,
>>>>> >> Nini
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> PS: E destul de usor sa comentezi post import CLC - discutiile si
>>>>> >> efortul depus pentru acest import au fost importante si trebuie sa
>>>>> >> gasim/identificam metode/proceduri care sa ne ajute sa refacem
>>>>> datele
>>>>> >> CLC care pot fi alterate din greseala
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> 2013/4/29 Razvan <radulescu.razvan at gmail.com
>>>>> >> <mailto:radulescu.razvan at gmail.com>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Pai sunt 3 zone busite deja. Mai este si in jurul Timisoarei si
>>>>> in
>>>>> >> jurul Ploiestiului...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On 29.04.2013 22:21, Strainu wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Cred ca( cel mai simplu ar fi sa( fie din nou rulat
>>>>> robotul pe
>>>>> >> zona respectiva(...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Strainu
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> În data de 29 aprilie 2013, 21:40, Razvan
>>>>> >> <radulescu.razvan at gmail.com
>>>>> >> <mailto:radulescu.razvan at gmail.com>> a scris:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Din cauza ca zonele astea de Corine Land au fost
>>>>> importate
>>>>> >> cu ajutorul unui
>>>>> >> soft(bot) probabil , de aceea sunt si facute asa ciudat,
>>>>> >> adica alcatuite din
>>>>> >> mai multe linii de contur care sunt de multe ori comune
>>>>> si
>>>>> >> cu alte
>>>>> >> delimitari, de paduri, rezidentiale, de lacuri etc( si
>>>>> >> toate acestea apr ca
>>>>> >> nerecunoscute de potlatch). Si e usor ca , fara intentie
>>>>> >> cineva la un moment
>>>>> >> dat sa redenumeasca doar o zona delimitata care apare
>>>>> ca
>>>>> >> nerecunoscuta de
>>>>> >> potlatch, in ceva cunoscut si probabil sau sa stearga o
>>>>> >> linie de delimitare
>>>>> >> - suficient ca sa se duca naibii o regiune de zeci de
>>>>> >> kilometri patrati.
>>>>> >> Cred ca va trebui luat si desenat pe portiuni ,
>>>>> padurile,
>>>>> >> farmland-uri,
>>>>> >> filed-uri si altele pentru a umple golurile. Si in felul
>>>>> >> asta daca se strica
>>>>> >> vreodata una, nu va afecta o zona asa de vasta si va fi
>>>>> >> usor de reparat.
>>>>> >> Dar sa vedem ce ne sfatuieste si Michael cand se
>>>>> intoarce
>>>>> >> din concediu...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On 29.04.2013 15:12, Janos Rusiczki wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Am citit mesajul, am verificat, dar nu stiu ce as putea
>>>>> >> face.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> 2013/4/29 Razvan <radulescu.razvan at gmail.com
>>>>> >> <mailto:radulescu.razvan at gmail.com>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Multumesc. Oricum cred ca este prea tarziu ca sa se
>>>>> >> mai dea un revert pe
>>>>> >> acolo. Asa ca, cineva, va trebui sa il refaca de
>>>>> mana
>>>>> >> ... Si asa
>>>>> >> importurile astea sunt facute cam aiurea deoarece
>>>>> >> cuprind zone prea vaste si
>>>>> >> la orice intrerupere pe contur se duce naiba toata
>>>>> >> zona. Si nu au nici o
>>>>> >> precizie buna a delimitarii. Mai bine era daca ar fi
>>>>> >> fost facute de mana pe
>>>>> >> suprafete mai mici deoarece era mai usor si de
>>>>> reparat.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On 29.04.2013 13:26, Vlad Bailescu wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Janos este din zona, poate stie mai multe.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Vlad
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:26 AM, razor74
>>>>> >> <radulescu.razvan at gmail.com
>>>>> >> <mailto:radulescu.razvan at gmail.com>>
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Salutare. Stie cineva daca era mai de mult
>>>>> stricat
>>>>> >> sau s-a intamplat de
>>>>> >> curand? CLC - paduri este nefunctional. Harta
>>>>> este
>>>>> >> alba in zona aceea...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> View this message in context:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/CLC-stricat-la-nord-de-Baia-Mare-tp5758796.html
>>>>> >> Sent from the Romania mailing list archive at
>>>>> >> Nabble.com.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> >> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> >> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> >> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> >> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> >> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> >> <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> >> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org <mailto:
>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> >> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org <mailto:
>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> >> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org <mailto:
>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> >> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> >> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> > Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ro mailing listTalk-ro at openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ro mailing list
>>> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cristian Draghici
>> http://www.loudhush.ro
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ro mailing listTalk-ro at openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ro mailing list
> Talk-ro at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ro
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ro/attachments/20130430/38c81286/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Talk-ro
mailing list