[Talk-transit] Proposed changes to oxomoa schema [part 2: stops]

Claudius Henrichs claudius.h at gmx.de
Tue Jun 29 10:38:40 BST 2010


Am 29.06.2010 10:22, Michał Borsuk:
> On 29.06.2010 09:33, Tiziano D'Angelo wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:23, Arun Ganesh <arun.planemad at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:arun.planemad at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Shouldn't we keep the schema to something that is easily
>>     compatible with the Google Transit GTFS format instead of
>>     developing something different all together?
>>
>>
> Doesn't GTFSsuggest one location for one unique stop name, whereas we 
> want each physical location belonging to a name as a separate point? 
> (this does not suggest incompatibility, just an overlay on GTFS)
>
> LMB
GTFS covers Oxomoa's extended form of tagging a stop area as well:
stops.txt contains an optional location_type where the value "1" would 
represent a public_transport=stop_area:
0 or blank - Stop. A location where passengers board or disembark from a 
transit vehicle.
1 - Station. A physical structure or area that contains one or more stop.

In most cases the stop positions in both directions will have different 
locations and thus different stop_lat and stop_lon in GTFS as well. So 
we are already "easily compatible".

Claudius
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-transit/attachments/20100629/120e2b27/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-transit mailing list