[Talk-transit] Proposed changes to oxomoa schema [part 2: stops]
Claudius Henrichs
claudius.h at gmx.de
Tue Jun 29 10:38:40 BST 2010
Am 29.06.2010 10:22, Michał Borsuk:
> On 29.06.2010 09:33, Tiziano D'Angelo wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:23, Arun Ganesh <arun.planemad at gmail.com
>> <mailto:arun.planemad at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Shouldn't we keep the schema to something that is easily
>> compatible with the Google Transit GTFS format instead of
>> developing something different all together?
>>
>>
> Doesn't GTFSsuggest one location for one unique stop name, whereas we
> want each physical location belonging to a name as a separate point?
> (this does not suggest incompatibility, just an overlay on GTFS)
>
> LMB
GTFS covers Oxomoa's extended form of tagging a stop area as well:
stops.txt contains an optional location_type where the value "1" would
represent a public_transport=stop_area:
0 or blank - Stop. A location where passengers board or disembark from a
transit vehicle.
1 - Station. A physical structure or area that contains one or more stop.
In most cases the stop positions in both directions will have different
locations and thus different stop_lat and stop_lon in GTFS as well. So
we are already "easily compatible".
Claudius
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-transit/attachments/20100629/120e2b27/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-transit
mailing list