[Talk-transit] Stop according to new PT scheme not rendered?

[Jo]

I went with the pragmatic solution, after being rebuffed several times.
You're not the first one who brings this up. :-)

It doesn't seem like there is a willingness to support the new scheme,
which leads me to say: ok, then it's not necessary to add the new tags, so
I don't. Then the rest of the mappers become annoyed because the validator
complains when they touch such route relations and even that is apparently
hard to fix without tagging on every route relation that it's only
implementing the new scheme half way through.

It's frustrating. I try to make the best of it. If you push me a bit, I'll
change the wiki page to reflect how I'm mapping at the moment. It may
relieve some frustration for new players, but it's more likely this will
cause an edit war on the wiki... which is why I didn't do it until now.

This situation is indeed ugly and not tenable.

Polyglot


2013/12/11 Ramas <ieskok at ramuno.lt>

>
> On 11 December 2013 16:57, fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I do not care about the renderer anymore as I did create tickets/issues
>> about it a long time ago and I did not get any response.
>>
>> For new objects I only use the new scheme (even do not add area=yes to
>> platforms).
>>
>> For existing objects I simply add the new scheme.
>>
>>
> Hi guys,
> yeah, it's hard to change rendering rules by just opening new ticket. You
> know, i have implemented my own public transport layer -
> http://openmap.lt/#l=51.97448,13.54597,7,MT
> I'm gonna upgrade my rendering rules to new scheme. Any feedback would
> help.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-transit/attachments/20131211/355f6203/attachment.html>