[Talk-us-massachusetts] Missing and unnamed streets

[Yury Yatsynovich]

>That is a lot, and I agree we need to figure out what's going on.  It
could actually be that names in addresses and names in roads do not
really match, in some cases.  But that many is not believable.

My impression from going through Berkshire is that absolute majority of
these 9K streets are the roads that do not have names in OSM.

On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:19 AM Angela Morley <amorley at protonmail.com>
wrote:

> For what it's worth, I also vote for a partial import process of
> non-conflicting data, then a second project for actually fixing the issues
> in whatever's left. The first phase should be documented in the Wiki, and
> we need to get our procedure together so imports@ can approve the action.
>
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On August 16, 2018 10:02 AM, Jason Remillard <remillard.jason at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
>
>> One thing that I've said repeatedly is that we should be expecting to
>> import the non-problematic set of addresses, and to expect that some
>> points are going to fail autaomated matching, and be left for either
>> later or some hand process.  Nobody has told me this is wrong, but I
>> keep hearing a "fix so we can import 100%" notion.
>>
>
> No, I have 100% given up on that. My vote is that Importing 98% of the
> data that matches perfectly is ok.
>
> Also, I will exclude Stow from the map roulette tasks.
>
> Jason
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Do you (and others) think we're headed to only importing points that
>> pass some automated matching process?
>>
>> > I will sign up for setting up the MapRoulette using the fuzzy search. I
>> > have time this weekend.
>>
>> Can you explain how the instructions work, and how maproulette avoids
>> people just doing a mechanical turk import?
>>
>> > Yury, no rush, but could you create a second data set (keep the fuzzy
>> > search data set available), and do a straight case-insensitive match. I
>> > would like to pick through Groton and Acton again and see what
>> percentage
>> > are issues in OSM again...
>>
>> Seconded.  I would likke to see what the results are in Stow.
>>
>
>

-- 
Yury Yatsynovich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us-massachusetts/attachments/20180816/817c67bc/attachment-0001.html>