[Talk-us-massachusetts] Missing and unnamed streets

[Greg Troxel]

Jason Remillard <remillard.jason at gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Greg,
>
>> One thing that I've said repeatedly is that we should be expecting to
>> import the non-problematic set of addresses, and to expect that some
>> points are going to fail autaomated matching, and be left for either
>> later or some hand process.  Nobody has told me this is wrong, but I
>> keep hearing a "fix so we can import 100%" notion.
>
> No, I have 100% given up on that. My vote is that Importing 98% of the data
> that matches perfectly is ok.

Glad to hear it.  It's tough to read tone over email, and I couldn't
tell "you're crazy and I don't want to get into it" from "that's so
obviously right it doesn't bear commenting" :-)

> Also, I will exclude Stow from the map roulette tasks.

Thanks.  I'm basically doing those manually.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 162 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us-massachusetts/attachments/20180817/c30e621a/attachment.sig>