[Talk-us] braided streets
SteveC
steve at asklater.com
Tue Apr 8 09:06:36 BST 2008
On 8 Apr 2008, at 10:13, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 23:55 -0700, Alan Millar wrote:
>>> The only thing I might do differently is not have the node shared
>>> between the railway and the streets. That's what I did for the
>>> TIGER
>>> upload: created two nodes at the same location. One for the
>>> street, one
>>> for the railway.
>>
>> Oh, that was on purpose? Oops. JOSM validator complains about
>> them, so
>> I've been merging them where I find them.
>
> Bah. My version doesn't do that. :)
>
> http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~daveh/josm/
>
> Please don't merge them any more. A common node really means that
> they
> share a point in space and that the point is navigable. If you can
> turn
> a train on to the street, then it's OK to share the node. :)
to sanity check - what I do at train crossings is that they share a
node, with railway:crossing on the node or whatever it is, but one way
is railway:rail and the other is highway:unclassified or whatever, and
so any sane routing app wont route one type on to the other
>
>
>> To me, it makes sense to combine them. If a car will have to drive
>> over
>> the tracks, then they should share the same node, it seems.
>>
>> I haven't really thought it through. How does it help to have them
>> be
>> separate nodes?
>
> I'm not sure it helps with much. It's just what I was asked to do
> long
> ago. :)
>
> -- Dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-us
>
Best
Steve
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list