[Talk-us] Request for comment on a section of Interstate 40

Victor Snesarev victor.snesarev at gmail.com
Thu Jul 3 21:54:45 BST 2008


Thanks for the feedback!

The thought of splitting the interstate into two ways has occurred to me,
but I thought I'd ask before undertaking such a fundamental edit. When I
split the interstate, should I copy TIGER tags to the new way?

BTW, is there an area of the world that you consider to be a good example of
how to do things?

Victor

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:36 PM, SteveC <steve at asklater.com> wrote:

>
> On 3 Jul 2008, at 13:32, Alex S. wrote:
>
> > SteveC wrote:
> >> * the off ramps should be marked oneway:yes ?
> >
> > This is supposed to be implied (look at the osmarender layer).  I
> > had to
> > explicitly mark oneway=no to get the arrows to go away in the rendered
> > map (there are a few two-way ramps near me).
> >
> > The single way for I-40 should be split into two - one for eastbound,
> > one for west - since the freeway is physically split (by what
> > appears to
> > be a k-rail in this section).  Oneway=yes is also implied for
> > highway=motorway.
>
> it is?
>
> Hmmmm. Well, I don't think it should be that way. Steve - is there a
> reason why this isn't rendered?
>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-us mailing list
> > Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-us
> >
>
> Best
>
> Steve
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-us
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20080703/5d7ae9f9/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list