[Talk-us] tiger:review=yes
Russ Nelson
nelson at crynwr.com
Fri Nov 28 18:41:44 GMT 2008
jim at cloudmade.com writes:
> One thing that would help a lot is if massive batch imports (tiger,
> mass gis etc) can each use a userid specific to the load. Then
> identifying un edited data it is simple as any edit changes the userid.
Absolutely.
> On a related topic... We are asuming that some portion of tiger data
> may never be edited as it is correct.., any feelings on how much this
> is, or how to detect it? One approach we sre consisering is to see it
> a road has pois along it... If so it is probably ok, I'd love other
> ideas.
Well, I think that was the point of the "tiger:reviewed=yes" tag.
Perhaps the procedure should be to delete the tiger:reviewed tag when
you review a way? Absence == yes.
--
--my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com | Delegislation is a slippery
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | slope to prosperity.
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 | Fewer laws, more freedom.
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog | (Not a GOP supporter).
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list