[Talk-us] Tiger 2007 Data

[Ian Dees]

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Russ Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> wrote:

> Nick Hocking writes:
>  > Can you confirm that any bulk upload of Tiger 2007 date will not erase
> or be
>  > overlaid over/under/alongside any existing user edits.
>
> I'm not Dave, but I'm quite sure that 1) he won't be smashing any user
> edits, and 2) I don't support the smashing of my edits either.  I've
> been careful to set true the "reviewed" attribute on my edits.  Have
> you?  Has everyone?  If so, then the path is clear: don't overwrite
> anything that's been reviewed.


I don't agree. If the "reviewed" flag was changed to yes without any change
to the imported data, then that means the new TIGER data will be better than
the old ("reviewed") data.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20081024/f4dd2450/attachment.html>