[Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

[Apollinaris Schoell]

>
>
> Why make this more complicated than it has to be?  Leave the names on
> the underlying way, not the relations; leave the refs on the  
> relations,
> not the underlying ways.  Then it's a matter of fixing mapnik and  
> t at h to
> do the right thing, since relations are set up better to handle things
> like route symbols.
>

fully agreed.
what is the best solution for another problem I have seen.
navigation systems should use the name/ref on the signs. the names are  
never (rarely?) used for interstate and us routes. but commonly used  
for county routes ( there the names is used and the ref is used rarely)

If a navigation system picks the ref it fails for the county highway  
if it picks the ref it fails on the interstates.
should we add a tag like name_signs on the relation?