[Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

Alex Mauer hawke at hawkesnest.net
Mon Apr 13 21:57:36 BST 2009


Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>>
>> Why make this more complicated than it has to be?  Leave the names on
>> the underlying way, not the relations; leave the refs on the  
>> relations,
>> not the underlying ways.  Then it's a matter of fixing mapnik and  
>> t at h to
>> do the right thing, since relations are set up better to handle things
>> like route symbols.
>>
> 
> fully agreed.
> what is the best solution for another problem I have seen.
> navigation systems should use the name/ref on the signs. the names are  
> never (rarely?) used for interstate and us routes. but commonly used  
> for county routes ( there the names is used and the ref is used rarely)

Correct the data to put the ref in on county highways.  It should be CTH
 xxx, where xxx is the reference value for the county highway.

-Alex Mauer 'hawke'

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20090413/3df88d73/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list