[Talk-us] What, exactly, does the absence of tiger:reviewed=no mean?

[Greg Troxel]

Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> writes:

> So currently, I think removing the reviewed:no means, "I've improved
> this" rather than, "I've perfected this."  To encourage or support more
> demanding requirements should surely be backed with a tool that reminds
> and suggests how to "fix" TIGER.

I would expect that removing review:no means something in between

  "this is now done about as well as I would have expected someone to do
  it in the first place"

and

  "this is now good enough that there's no reason for anyone else to
  worry about it"


To answer Russ's question I think it means:

  turn restriction relations aren't everywhere, so expecting those is
  too much

  way is more or less in the right place, to the point where someone
  navigating using the map won't hvae trouble

  name and basic attributes are right or close enough
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 193 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20090426/a8c9e3db/attachment.pgp>