[Talk-us] tiger:separated

[chunter952 at gmail.com]

As far as I can tell, that is the intended purpose of the tag.  

Someone else correct me if I'm wrong, but I've been deleting the seperated tag whenever I add in the parallel way. 

The most important thing to do in these cases is to make sure you add the oneway=yes  tag and either create or update the route relationship so the divided street/road renders correctly. 
------Original Message------
From: David Carmean
Sender: talk-us-bounces at openstreetmap.org
To: OSM US Talk
Subject: [Talk-us] tiger:separated
Sent: Jul 24, 2009 10:19 PM


What is the intent of the tiger:separated tag?  Was it to indicate that a single way actually 
represents a set of two or more parallel ways?  

What should we do when we modify a single TIGER way to represent the true divided nature of a 
street/road?  For example, when I copy the entire way and paste a copy offset by a few meters 
to form the other direction of the road?  Should tiger:separated be considered immutable and 
left alone?  Or deleted?  Or changed to 'yes'?




_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile