[Talk-us] Mapping of State/county/national parks
Andrew Ayre
andy at britishideas.com
Thu Jun 25 23:28:41 BST 2009
Does boundary=national_park have nothing to do with US National Parks?
I.e. it's just a park at the national level?
Andy
Tyler wrote:
> Just tagging the underlying landtypes and uses is fine (aside from most
> of them not being natural) but doesn't at all account for the difference
> between scrubland/seashore/whatever where you will be shot to death if
> you trespass (military installations) and that which you're free to roam
> around on and is designated a park.
>
>
> Then use the boundary key. If you way up each of the unique
> sections, then create a multipolygon relation out of all of the
> boundary ways and additional multipolygons for each of the various
> landuses or ground covers.
>
>
> Boundaries are a good solution, and are easy for the national lands set
> aside for recreation boundary=national_park covers them nicely (and
> renderers could easily decide to render them as filled green
> areas--standard practice).
>
> Through a quick discussion on #osm I'm going with boundary=national_park
> (for all parks that aren't urban parks), admin_level="whatever the
> operator level is", operator="whoever the operator is" and
> ownership="whoever the owner is" parsing that out to re-tag it
> consistently later should be relatively trivial.
>
> Thanks for the discussion Adam,
>
> -Tyler
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Andy
PGP Key ID: 0xDC1B5864
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list