[Talk-us] Super Wal-Mart Tag

[Matthias Julius]

"Randy" <rwtnospam-newsgp at yahoo.com> writes:

> Dale Puch wrote:
>
>>For the same reason as doing nodes at a mall or similar.  To know the
>>stores/services available, not just the type of stuff that is usually 
>>there.
>>
>>If your tagging fast food, why would you not tag the McDonalds in the super
>>walmart as well?  Or the bank ect.  As for the walmart services themselves,
>>that can be one node, but with the seprate services listed in tags.
>>
>>Dale
>
> Would it be improper to tag the true Wal-Mart services to the building 
> way, (either using semicolons or "shop_n" and "amenity_n", and the 
> "partnered" services (McDonald's, etc.) as separate nodes in the building, 
> and related with "is-in"?

I consider numbered tags to be messy.  Nodes inside the building is not
better unless you are really producing a map of the building's
internals.

I would use relations for this purpose, e.g. one relation per shop.

Matthias