[Talk-us] Super Wal-Mart Tag

[Randy]

Matthias Julius wrote:

>"Randy" <rwtnospam-newsgp at yahoo.com> writes:
>
>>Dale Puch wrote:
>>
>>>For the same reason as doing nodes at a mall or similar.  To know the
>>>stores/services available, not just the type of stuff that is usually
>>>there.
>>>
>>>If your tagging fast food, why would you not tag the McDonalds in the 
>>>super
>>>walmart as well?  Or the bank ect.  As for the walmart services 
>>>themselves,
>>>that can be one node, but with the seprate services listed in tags.
>>>
>>>Dale
>>
>>Would it be improper to tag the true Wal-Mart services to the building
>>way, (either using semicolons or "shop_n" and "amenity_n", and the
>>"partnered" services (McDonald's, etc.) as separate nodes in the building,
>>and related with "is-in"?
>
>I consider numbered tags to be messy.  Nodes inside the building is not
>better unless you are really producing a map of the building's
>internals.
>
>I would use relations for this purpose, e.g. one relation per shop.
>
>Matthias

I guess I still don't understand all there is to know about relations. I 
thought you had to have a map entry such as a node or way to relate, in a 
relation. Back to the wiki for me.

-- 
Randy