[Talk-us] Salt Fork Lake rendering issue
aschoell at gmail.com
Tue Oct 13 17:05:46 BST 2009
On 13 Oct 2009, at 2:03 , David ``Smith'' wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Seth Fitzsimmons <seth at mojodna.net>
>> That looks likely. Quabbin Reservoir (Western MA) is also rendering
>> similarly: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.3749&lon=-72.2847&zoom=12&layers=0B00FTF
>> Last I checked, landuse=reservoir is being rendered like
>> even though it shouldn't be. With the MassGIS OpenSpace import, lots
>> of landuse=reservoir polys were imported and represent "protected
>> areas", not water.
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Apollinaris Schoell <aschoell at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>> Just a guess. landuse=reservoir overrules natural water.
> I don't think that's the issue. For one thing, Quabbin renders fine
> in Mapnik, but poorly in Osmarender. For Salt Fork Lake, the opposite
> is true. So they are two unrelated problems. For another thing, all
> of the relevant wiki pages seem to indicate that landuse=reservoir is
> just as valid as natural=water for this type of feature. (What kind
> of "protected area" was tagged as landuse=reservoir in the MassGIS
> import? Unless those areas protect water, that tagging is wrong.)
> Besides, I've done numerous smaller bodies of water which are both
> landuse=reservoir and natural=water, as multipolygons and as single
> ways, and this is the only one causing problems.
why don't you try it instead of wild guess?
the rendering doesn't care what's in the wiki. the wiki can be
completely wrong. check the rendering style and you will know for sure.
for the tags itself landuse on a lake? doesn't make any sense to me.
> David "Smith"
> a.k.a. Vid the Kid
> a.k.a. Bír'd'in
> Does this font make me look fat?
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-us