[Talk-us] Unpaved streets

[Ian Dees]

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Alex Mauer <hawke at hawkesnest.net> wrote:

> On 09/03/2009 09:17 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
> > No tag should ever imply any other tag. It's always better to be more
> > verbose than not.
>
> No it's not.  Are you seriously putting oneway=no (just to name one
> example) on every street you tag?


Dangit, someone (probably you, Alex :) ) made this point before. You're
right ... but I don't think of oneway=no as an implied tag. I would call it
the default for all road ways... which I guess is an implied tag.

Ok, how about this: implied tags should be the exception, not the rule.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20090903/ef0128b3/attachment.html>