[Talk-us] A Friendly Guide to 'Bots and Imports
ian.dees at gmail.com
Thu Aug 5 19:52:52 BST 2010
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Ian Dees <ian.dees at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think the NHD "import" is a good example of a well-intentioned importer
> > (me) gone wrong. I had initially planned to import the whole darn thing
> > one swoop, but various technical and life challenges came up before I
> > get it going. While I was working on those issues, people started
> > it themselves (sometimes marking so on the wiki, sometimes not). Now that
> > there are some areas imported, the import of the whole dataset becomes
> > infinitely harder because we have to match existing data with new
> > data.
> But how is this any different from importing it into an area where
> people have already mapped some lakes from aerials?
It isn't any different. I had made the (bad) decision at the time to import
over any existing data because in the several hundred places I spot-checked,
NHD was vastly superior in resolution (and probably quality).
If we wanted to support imports as a community, a tool like  should be
the only way of letting imports in to OSM.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us