[Talk-us] Changeset 5393406

[Eric Wolf]

Cool. This may end up being part of the USGS project once it gets opened up
to the public as well. The USGS standard for evaluating data is a visual
inspection against NAIP. So we're already planning to provide NAIP for at
least the areas we are experimenting in.

-Eric

-=--=---=----=----=---=--=-=--=---=----=---=--=-=-
Eric B. Wolf                           720-334-7734





On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Ian Dees <ian.dees at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm have a private tilecache for NAIP and am working on a public one right
> now.
>
> I'll publicize it when I get it working.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Eric Wolf <ebwolf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I know this seems like a silly question, coming from me and all, but where
>> are you getting your NAIP tiles from?
>>
>> One of the things that I keep trying to convince the bosses of is that a
>> cached set of tiles for the entire NAIP imagery set would be very useful to
>> many people. Right now, I think the best you can get are some sloppy reduced
>> resolution dynamic (re: slow) tiles - at least from the USGS. But because
>> it's a USDA dataset, it's always given low priority.
>>
>> I know MicroImages has a pretty extensive copy of NAIP via WMS:
>>
>> http://www.microimages.com/geodata/us-orthophotos/
>>
>> -Eric
>>
>> <http://www.microimages.com/geodata/us-orthophotos/>
>> -=--=---=----=----=---=--=-=--=---=----=---=--=-=-
>> Eric B. Wolf                           720-334-7734
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Toby Murray <toby.murray at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Alrighty then. Glad that's sorted out. I hope my deleting a couple
>>> thousand of the nodes won't make reverting more difficult.
>>>
>>> As a side note, I was using the USGS NAIP imagery to trace the lake
>>> when I noticed these nodes. So on balance I don't think I'll hold it
>>> against you :)
>>>
>>> Toby
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Eric Wolf <ebwolf at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Bugger... I was just looking at the changeset metadata again. That did
>>> come
>>> > from bulk_upload.py but I'll be damned if I didn't have it pointing at
>>> our
>>> > server. I'm going to have to check out the code tomorrow to see why it
>>> hit
>>> > osm.org and not our box. That's just not right.
>>> > -Eric
>>> > -=--=---=----=----=---=--=-=--=---=----=---=--=-=-
>>> > Eric B. Wolf                           720-334-7734
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Talk-us mailing list
>>> > Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>>> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20100812/149a668d/attachment.html>