[Talk-us] Changeset 5393406

[Ian Dees]

I've noticed lots of leaf-on imagery in my WMS URL in the Wisconsin and
Minnesota area (which were flown pretty recently), so I wonder if that
decision was already made.

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Eric Wolf <ebwolf at gmail.com> wrote:

> Interesting. I'll have to do a little sleuthing tomorrow at the office and
> tell you what the different URLs are (and if there is anything better yet).
> Just a quick browse tells me what you are using draws from The National Map
> whereas Ian's URL was purely NAIP. The National Map includes the imagery
> captured as part of the 133 most populated places and is .3m color as well
> as a few other flyovers.
>
> I heard a rumor the other day that the USDA wants to start doing NAIP
> leaf-on (i.e., when the trees have full canopies). That sucks for most
> purposes other than monitoring the health of trees. But that's just a rumor
> right now.
>
> -Eric
>
> -=--=---=----=----=---=--=-=--=---=----=---=--=-=-
> Eric B. Wolf                           720-334-7734
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Toby Murray <toby.murray at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Looks like it was actually Ian who posted this WMS URL a couple weeks ago:
>>
>> http://isse.cr.usgs.gov/ArcGIS/services/Combined/USGS_EDC_Ortho_NAIP/MapServer/WMSServer?request=GetMap&format=image/jpeg&service=WMS&version=1.1.0&layers=0&STYLES=default&
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Toby Murray <toby.murray at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I'm using this WMS URL in JOSM:
>> >
>> http://isse.cr.usgs.gov/arcgis/services/Combined/SDDS_Imagery/MapServer/WMSServer?SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG:4326&FORMAT=image/png&layers=0&request=map&
>> >
>> > Last night is was downright speedy. Tonight it is being a little
>> > slower. At times it is barely usable.
>> >
>> > I know someone else had a slightly different URL that they were using
>> > too. Not sure what the differences were.
>> >
>> > In my city I have permission to us 6" aerial imagery from my county
>> > GIS department but the NAIP imagery is useful when I'm working out in
>> > the rural areas of Kansas.
>> >
>> > Toby
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Eric Wolf <ebwolf at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I know this seems like a silly question, coming from me and all, but
>> where
>> >> are you getting your NAIP tiles from?
>> >> One of the things that I keep trying to convince the bosses of is that
>> a
>> >> cached set of tiles for the entire NAIP imagery set would be very
>> useful to
>> >> many people. Right now, I think the best you can get are some sloppy
>> reduced
>> >> resolution dynamic (re: slow) tiles - at least from the USGS. But
>> because
>> >> it's a USDA dataset, it's always given low priority.
>> >> I know MicroImages has a pretty extensive copy of NAIP via WMS:
>> >> http://www.microimages.com/geodata/us-orthophotos/
>> >> -Eric
>> >>
>> >> -=--=---=----=----=---=--=-=--=---=----=---=--=-=-
>> >> Eric B. Wolf                           720-334-7734
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Toby Murray <toby.murray at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Alrighty then. Glad that's sorted out. I hope my deleting a couple
>> >>> thousand of the nodes won't make reverting more difficult.
>> >>>
>> >>> As a side note, I was using the USGS NAIP imagery to trace the lake
>> >>> when I noticed these nodes. So on balance I don't think I'll hold it
>> >>> against you :)
>> >>>
>> >>> Toby
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Eric Wolf <ebwolf at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > Bugger... I was just looking at the changeset metadata again. That
>> did
>> >>> > come
>> >>> > from bulk_upload.py but I'll be damned if I didn't have it pointing
>> at
>> >>> > our
>> >>> > server. I'm going to have to check out the code tomorrow to see why
>> it
>> >>> > hit
>> >>> > osm.org and not our box. That's just not right.
>> >>> > -Eric
>> >>> > -=--=---=----=----=---=--=-=--=---=----=---=--=-=-
>> >>> > Eric B. Wolf                           720-334-7734
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > _______________________________________________
>> >>> > Talk-us mailing list
>> >>> > Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>> >>> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20100813/5ff6af30/attachment-0001.html>