[Talk-us] Address Node Import for San Francisco

Ian Dees ian.dees at gmail.com
Fri Dec 10 01:37:07 GMT 2010

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Serge Wroclawski <emacsen at gmail.com> wrote:

> >>> 3) Having looked at the data catalogue page, I do have concerns about
> the
> >>> terms of use and think it's best to get SF to explicitly agree to allow
> >>> to use the data.
> >>>
> >>> http://gispub02.sfgov.org/website/sfshare/index2.asp
> I'd have legal look at this. I'm a little confused by some of the
> wording about deravitive works and transfered rights and
> indemnification.

It's a fairly standard (if a little more wordy) indemnification agreement.
The derivative works stuff is making sure that no one can hold the San Fran
government liable for using the data directly or indirectly or when used as
part of a derivative work.

I don't see anything preventing the data from being used or traced by OSM. I
don't even see an attribution requirement.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20101209/6b1fe935/attachment.html>

More information about the Talk-us mailing list