[Talk-us] TIGER 2010 Imports
ian.dees at gmail.com
Tue Dec 21 12:06:06 GMT 2010
Antony from MapQuest basically said that in order to do it correctly it
would take a full-history planet dump and they don't have the space to do
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Alan Mintz
<Alan_Mintz+OSM at earthlink.net<Alan_Mintz%2BOSM at earthlink.net>
> Anyone know if the problem with the tigerviewer map showing too much red is
> being worked on, or where to report it?
> At 2010-12-16 06:07, Alan Mintz wrote:
> At 2010-12-15 10:04, Ian Dees wrote:
> Look at the TIGER edited map. There is *lots* of untouched TIGER data in
> Do you know what the criteria are for red vs. green? Unless this came from
> a very old dataset (<2009), I believe it's wrong. I see _way_ too much red
> in places where I've done a lot of work.
> Here's a simple case:
> If you look at the blocks framed by Hermosa, Hillside, and Haven, it shows
> only one green road.
> If you look at the area with the data view in OSM at
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=34.15963&lon=-117.58032&zoom=16&layers=M, you'll see that I edited every street, correcting geometry, tagging source
> and source_ref, researching naming discrepancies, adding cul-de-sacs, etc.
> In particular, if you look at
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/7268631/history , you see that I
> first edited it at Wed, 27 May 2009 10:41:28 +0000.
> Does it maybe ignore ways where balrog-kun (or another bot) was last to
> act, even if the way was previously edited?
> Alan Mintz <Alan_Mintz+OSM at Earthlink.net>
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-us