[Talk-us] TIGER 2010 Imports
toby.murray at gmail.com
Tue Dec 21 15:08:32 GMT 2010
We have discussed  a cheaper way of doing it to at least be a
better approximation and Antony commented on my blog saying that they
would try to incorporate this.
(and the following 3 messages)
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Ian Dees <ian.dees at gmail.com> wrote:
> Antony from MapQuest basically said that in order to do it correctly it
> would take a full-history planet dump and they don't have the space to do
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Alan Mintz <Alan_Mintz+OSM at earthlink.net>
>> Anyone know if the problem with the tigerviewer map showing too much red
>> is being worked on, or where to report it?
>> At 2010-12-16 06:07, Alan Mintz wrote:
>> At 2010-12-15 10:04, Ian Dees wrote:
>> Look at the TIGER edited map. There is *lots* of untouched TIGER data in
>> Do you know what the criteria are for red vs. green? Unless this came from
>> a very old dataset (<2009), I believe it's wrong. I see _way_ too much red
>> in places where I've done a lot of work.
>> Here's a simple case:
>> If you look at the blocks framed by Hermosa, Hillside, and Haven, it shows
>> only one green road.
>> If you look at the area with the data view in OSM at
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=34.15963&lon=-117.58032&zoom=16&layers=M ,
>> you'll see that I edited every street, correcting geometry, tagging source
>> and source_ref, researching naming discrepancies, adding cul-de-sacs, etc.
>> In particular, if you look at
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/7268631/history , you see that I
>> first edited it at Wed, 27 May 2009 10:41:28 +0000.
>> Does it maybe ignore ways where balrog-kun (or another bot) was last to
>> act, even if the way was previously edited?
>> Alan Mintz <Alan_Mintz+OSM at Earthlink.net>
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-us